Desorbent swing adsorption process using ethylene to separate propane and propylene under isobaric conditions

•Desorbent swing adsorption using weak desorbent to produce propylene was proposed.•Breakthrough and desorption characteristics of ethylene on zeolite 13X were analyzed.•Adsorption behaviors of the desorbent were key factors for isobaric DSA.•A low-temperature change of DSA enhanced separation and inhibited side reactions.•Two-bed DSA achieved high propylene purity > 99.999 % with 99.39 % recovery. The separation of olefin and paraffin using adsorption technology remains a significant challenge. This study proposes a novel desorbent swing adsorption (DSA) process using an olefin desorbent with a weaker adsorption affinity (C2: ethylene) to separate a paraffin/olefin mixture with a higher adsorption affinity (C3s: propane and propylene) under isobaric conditions, which is the reverse concept of using a desorbent with a stronger affinity in conventional DSA systems. The proposed DSA process effectively separates the C3 mixture because the deteriorating effects caused by the desorbent is minimized. Based on sequential breakthrough experiments with zeolite 13X DSA using ethylene, the efficient separation of a propylene dehydrogenation product (propane:propylene = 60:40 vol%) to produce polymer-grade propylene is achieved. It is confirmed that ethylene desorbent stream pushes out the adsorbed propylene and regenerates the adsorption bed without changing the pressure. The desorption step plays a key role in the separation performance of the proposed DSA process because the regenerated bed offers favorable conditions when filled with the weaker desorbent after the desorption step. The flowrate of the desorbent strongly affects the efficiency of propylene desorption. After validating the dynamic mathematical model using the experimental results, a two-bed DSA process using a six-step sequence that includes rinse export/import and idle steps is shown to achieve a propylene purity above 99.999 % (desorbent-free basis) with a recovery of 99.39 %, a productivity of 4.21 mol∙kg−1∙hr−1, and an ethylene usage of 7.59 mol∙kg−1∙hr−1. This study offers important insights into the development of adsorptive separation designs for olefin/paraffin separation.