Comparison of macro and micro-pollutants abatement from biotreated landfill leachate by single ozonation, O3/H2O2, and catalytic ozonation processes

[Display omitted] •The valid stages in which two ozone-based AOPs play an enhancement role are different.•Catalytic ozonation enhances direct oxidation, while O3/H2O2 for indirect oxidation.•Surrogate predictive model for MPs removal can be expanded to high-strength leachate.•The MPs could achieve more than 90% elimination when the COD removal exceeds 30%.•The O3/H2O2 process consumes the least energy if desired COD removal is >35% Micropollutants (MPs) in landfill leachate have attracted increasing attention because they pose a potential threat to the aquatic environment and ecosystems once discharged into nearby aquifers without proper treatment. Although ozone-based oxidative techniques perform well for the removal of MPs in low-strength water streams, their role in leachate containing high dissolved organic matter (DOM) concentration requires further exploration. Moreover, it is unclear the mechanism of different ozone-based processes in advanced treatment for biotreated landfill leachate. This study compared the single ozonation and two ozone-based advanced oxidation processes (AOPs, heterogeneous catalytic ozonation and O3/H2O2 process) for polishing biotreated leachate. The mechanism of different ozone-based processes during leachate treatment was explored, which facilitates selecting of the appropriate process based on leachate quality and target treatment requirements. The removal efficiency and energy requirements of the macro and micro-pollutants were evaluated. The results revealed that the role of catalytic ozonation is mainly to enhance the direct ozone oxidation, whereas the O3/H2O2 process is to promote the indirect oxidation. The strengthening effect was most visible in the early stage (specific transferred ozone dose (STOD) 0.95), which provides a surrogate-based predictive model for the removal of MPs from high-strength leachate. Catalytic ozonation consumed the least amount of energy when the desired chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal was ≤ 35 %, otherwise, the O3/H2O2 process was the most energy-efficient. In any process, MPs with O3 or OH reactivity could achieve more than 90 % elimination when the COD removal exceeded 30 %.