SOC and TN fluctuations determine the variations in microbial enzymatic activities under diverse land use types in the Central Himalaya, India
[Display omitted] •Soil properties and enzymatic activities varied across land use types and villages.•Agroforestry establishment accelerated soil enzymatic activities by 39.41–90.17%.•Cultivation caused massive decline in level and variability of enzymatic activities.•Climate, vegetation, and manag...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Catena (Giessen) 2024-05, Vol.240, p.107958, Article 107958 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | [Display omitted]
•Soil properties and enzymatic activities varied across land use types and villages.•Agroforestry establishment accelerated soil enzymatic activities by 39.41–90.17%.•Cultivation caused massive decline in level and variability of enzymatic activities.•Climate, vegetation, and management practices determined the enzymatic activities.
Soil microbial enzymatic activities, often used as indicators of soil health and fertility, are vulnerable to changes in climate and anthropogenic activities. This study analyses the responses of specific soil enzymatic activities– dehydrogenase (DHA), acid phosphatase (APH), β-glucosidase (BG) and urease (URE)– in Nitosols/Luvisols of the subtropical zone of the Central Himalaya, India. We investigated how these enzymatic activities vary with different land uses: arable land (AL), kitchen garden (KG) and peach orchard (PO), across four villages– Niglat, Kainchidham, Majhera and Syalikhet. Considering associated management practices, we quantified cumulative average soil enzymatic activities for the rabi season (2017–2018). In general, catalytic activity of the selected enzymes was highest in Syalikhet and lowest in Majhera. However, for land use types, enzymatic activities were lower in AL and KG (75.56–90.17% and 39.41–61.72%, respectively) compared to PO values. MANOVA analysis evaluated significant spatial differences (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0341-8162 1872-6887 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.catena.2024.107958 |