How do sEMG segmentation parameters influence pattern recognition process? An approach based on wearable sEMG sensor

Processing surface electromyography (sEMG) data in real-time to control robotic devices in applications involving upper-limb prostheses is challenging, especially when the problem involves multi-class recognition. A typical processing pipeline in this kind of system presents the following steps: seg...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biomedical signal processing and control 2023-03, Vol.81, p.104546, Article 104546
Hauptverfasser: Mendes Junior, José Jair Alves, Pontim, Carlos Eduardo, Dias, Thiago Simões, Campos, Daniel Prado
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Processing surface electromyography (sEMG) data in real-time to control robotic devices in applications involving upper-limb prostheses is challenging, especially when the problem involves multi-class recognition. A typical processing pipeline in this kind of system presents the following steps: segmentation, feature extraction, and classification. An under-exploited issue is the segmentation step, usually a windowing technique whose parameters are mostly heuristically defined. In this context, this work examines some segmentation parameters and how it affects the accuracy in the classification of hand gestures using a commercial sEMG wearable device. The main contribution of the work is to point out recommendations and insights about the segmentation step. Our findings show that for most feature sets and classifiers, there is no significant difference in using window lengths over 500 ms; however, for some cases, this value can be smaller without depreciating the accuracy. Moreover, there is no significant difference in using the truncated signal, which means using the first half of the signal in relation to the whole signal; no gesture is privileged in relation to the others due to the change in the segmentation parameters; data augmentation caused by changes on segmentation could affect the classification error; and the best performance was observed using TD9 feature set, SVMR classifier with an overlap fraction of 25%. [Display omitted] •Feature sets and classifiers can be less sensitive for segmentation parameters.•Overlap fraction exert high influence, more overlapping, less was the error.•Signals with only the sEMG transitory provide same response than whole signal.•Segmentation does not privilege classes in the pattern recognition process.•The data augmentation caused by the segmentation parameters is relevant.
ISSN:1746-8094
1746-8108
DOI:10.1016/j.bspc.2022.104546