Optimal harvest number and genotypic evaluation of total dry biomass, stability, and adaptability of elephant grass clones for bioenergy purposes

For elephant grass breeding for bioenergy purposes, selection should be based on repeated harvests to maximize the selection efficiency. Selecting genotypes with high total dry biomass, associated with high adaptability and stability, is extremely important. Thus, the objective of this study was to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biomass & bioenergy 2021-06, Vol.149, p.106104, Article 106104
Hauptverfasser: Ferreira, Filipe Manoel, Rocha, João Romero do Amaral Santos de Carvalho, Bhering, Leonardo Lopes, Fernandes, Francisco Duarte, Lédo, Francisco José da Silva, Rangel, José Henrique de Albuquerque, Kopp, Maurício, Câmara, Tassiano Maxwell Marinho, Ribeiro da Silva, Vanessa Quitete, Machado, Juarez Campolina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:For elephant grass breeding for bioenergy purposes, selection should be based on repeated harvests to maximize the selection efficiency. Selecting genotypes with high total dry biomass, associated with high adaptability and stability, is extremely important. Thus, the objective of this study was to estimate the minimum number of harvests required for total dry biomass to enable an accurate selection of elephant grass clones in multiple environmental trials. Additionally, the relative performance of genetic values (HMRPGV) and centroid methods were used to cluster and rank the best clones on the basis of their total dry biomass, adaptability, and stability. Nineteen clones and two checks were evaluated in six environments. Two or four harvests were performed in each environment. A mixed model methodology (REML/BLUP) was used to estimate the variance components and predict the genotypic values. The repeatability coefficient for total dry biomass was 0.20. The accuracies of performing two and four harvests were 59% and 72%, respectively. The increase in selection efficiency by performing two, four, and seven harvests instead of just one was 29%, 57%, and 76%, respectively. Finally, the clones were clustered into four classes according to their total dry biomass, adaptability, and stability. We conclude that at least seven harvests are required to achieve an accuracy of 80%, and that the HMRPGV and centroid methods are practical, visual, and reliable for simultaneously clustering, ranking, and selection of clones based on their adaptability, stability, and total dry biomass production. •Seven harvests were needed to achieve high accuracy.•Selection efficiency was maximized in the seventh cut.•The HMPRVG and centroid method classified the genotypes into four groups.•There were changes in the genotypes ranking across environments.
ISSN:0961-9534
1873-2909
DOI:10.1016/j.biombioe.2021.106104