Comparison of noninvasive, in-situ and external monitoring of microbial growth in fed-batch cultivations in Corynebacterium glutamicum

[Display omitted] •Growth was monitored using five different technologies.•The sensors were robust to common bio-process variables like agitation and aeration.•Noise inherited in the sensors was successfully reduced using Gaussian filter.•Gaussian filter facilitated the estimation of biomass growth...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biochemical engineering journal 2021-06, Vol.170, p.107989, Article 107989
Hauptverfasser: Lira-Parada, Pedro A., Tuveri, Andrea, Seibold, Gerd M., Bar, Nadav
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:[Display omitted] •Growth was monitored using five different technologies.•The sensors were robust to common bio-process variables like agitation and aeration.•Noise inherited in the sensors was successfully reduced using Gaussian filter.•Gaussian filter facilitated the estimation of biomass growth rates from the signals. Automated bioprocess systems rely on accurate online measurements of cellular growth. In the present study, six sensors representing five different technologies, namely near-infrared absorbance, external non-invasive light scattering, back scattering reflectance, dielectric spectroscopy and exhaust gas analysis were evaluated in online monitoring of growth of the microbial cell factory Corynebacterium glutamicum. The signal outputs were monitored during the stationary growth phase of the cells under different conditions of agitation and aeration, conditions that pose potential interference with the in-situ signals. The random noise of the measurements was filtered using a Gaussian filter and the time derivatives were computed to obtain information of the microbial growth rate. Surprisingly, the signals of most probes under fed-batch cultivations of C. glutamicum were highly correlated with the stirring, but were mostly unaffected by the airflow, despite the increase in air bubbles that can cause measurement interference. Taken together, we show that an online estimation of growth of C. glutamicum based on the different sensor signals was possible with linear and multiple linear regression, correcting for the effect of stirring, and an estimation of growth rate was made accurate with an implementation of a Gaussian filter.
ISSN:1369-703X
1873-295X
DOI:10.1016/j.bej.2021.107989