Stacking machine learning models versus a locally weighted linear model to generate high-resolution monthly precipitation over a topographically complex area

This study applied a stacked generalization ensemble approach to generate high-resolution precipitation estimates and compared its performance with an optimized local weighted linear regression (LWLR) algorithm, a well-known local precipitation-elevation interpolation method incorporating physiograp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Atmospheric research 2022-07, Vol.272, p.106159, Article 106159
Hauptverfasser: Zandi, Omid, Zahraie, Banafsheh, Nasseri, Mohsen, Behrangi, Ali
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study applied a stacked generalization ensemble approach to generate high-resolution precipitation estimates and compared its performance with an optimized local weighted linear regression (LWLR) algorithm, a well-known local precipitation-elevation interpolation method incorporating physiographical factors. The stacked generalization ensemble consists of multilayer perceptron neural network (MLP), support vector machine (SVM), and random forest (RF) combined through a meta-learning algorithm with/without rescanning input covariates. Sixteen input covariates, including 2 topographic features, 5 cloud properties, 5 environmental variables, 3 precipitation products (PPs), and inverse distance weighted (IDW) estimates as the precipitation background field were fed into the machine learning models. Hold out approach was adopted for performance evaluation in which 50% of the 174 gauges were used for training, and the rest was used for validation. The results indicated that the overall monthly MAE, RMSE, and rBias of the proposed stacking model for the validation dataset were 3.3%, 6.8%, and 50%, respectively, less than that of the RF model, which is the best individual model. Also, the stacking model outperformed LWLR by decreasing monthly MAE, RMSE, and rBias 10.7%, 19.1%, and 28.6%, respectively. Further analysis implied that (1) the stacked model is more robust than LWLR and less dependent on the density of gauges, thus suitable for areas with scarce gauge coverage; (2) comparing the spatial distribution of mean monthly precipitation maps, generated by stacking and LWLR models, stacking algorithm can successfully screen out the bulls' eyes of background IDW precipitation field, and both patterns are consistent with the topography of the area; and (3) the stacking scheme is found to have a better extrapolation ability than LWLR over high elevations. •A stacking ensemble model is developed to generate monthly precipitation maps.•The stacked model outperforms the individual machine learning models.•The machine learning models are compared with an optimized localized linear model.•Sixteen covariates are fed to the machine learning models.•The proposed methods are applied to a topographically complex area in Iran.
ISSN:0169-8095
1873-2895
DOI:10.1016/j.atmosres.2022.106159