15N natural abundance of vehicular exhaust ammonia, quantified by active sampling techniques

Vehicular exhaust has been identified as an important ammonia (NH3) emission source in urban areas using the stable isotope tracer technique (δ15N); however, its δ15N signature remains poorly constrained due to difficulties in concentrating and speciating NHx (NH3 + particulate NH4+). In this study,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Atmospheric environment (1994) 2021-06, Vol.255, p.118430, Article 118430
Hauptverfasser: Song, Linlin, Walters, Wendell W., Pan, Yuepeng, Li, Zhengjie, Gu, Mengna, Duan, Yihang, Lü, Xuemei, Fang, Yunting
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Vehicular exhaust has been identified as an important ammonia (NH3) emission source in urban areas using the stable isotope tracer technique (δ15N); however, its δ15N signature remains poorly constrained due to difficulties in concentrating and speciating NHx (NH3 + particulate NH4+). In this study, we deployed two active sampling techniques, MCIs (Multi-nozzle Cascade Impactor sampler; “particle-gas” order) and CCSCs (ChemComb Speciation Cartridge sampler; “gas-particle” order), to collect vehicular exhaust NHx in a long urban tunnel in Shenyang, China, and quantified the 15N from the collected NH3 and NH4+. While no significant difference in tunnel NH3 concentrations between the two samplers was observed (n = 21), the δ15N-NH3 was slightly higher using the MCIs (6.3 ± 1.6‰) compared to the CCSCs (4.8 ± 2.3‰) during the tunnel operation period. This minor absolute difference of 1.5 ± 2.8‰ may derive from denuder-saturation used within the CCSCs that lead to NHx speciation ambiguity, which also caused significant δ15N-pNH4+ differences between the two sampling approaches. Our results suggest that both active samplers can well characterize the δ15N-NHx in the ambient environment, but the “particle - gas” sampling approach performs better in elevated NH3 concentration environments. We recommend that the δ15N value of 6.3‰ is used as the isotope end member for vehicle NH3 when performing NH3 source apportionment. [Display omitted] •Two types of active samplers were used to collect vehicular exhaust NHx in urban tunnel.•Minor δ15N–NH3 difference (~1.5‰) was observed between two types of active samplers.•The “particle - gas” sampling type may perform better in high NH3 environments.•A value of 6.3‰ is recommended as the δ15N signatures of vehicle NH3 for source apportionment.
ISSN:1352-2310
1873-2844
DOI:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118430