Nile tilapia production in polyculture with freshwater shrimp using an aquaponic system and biofloc technology

This study aimed to evaluate the performance of Nile tilapia, freshwater shrimp, lettuce, and watercress in an aquaponic system used in conjunction with biofloc technology. Experimental units consisted of an aquaponic module comprising two containers, one to accommodate vegetables (500 L media-fille...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Aquaculture 2022-03, Vol.551, p.737916, Article 737916
Hauptverfasser: Barbosa, Phillipe Thiago Leite, Povh, Jayme Aparecido, Farias, Karine Nathiele Nogueira, da Silva, Tiago Venâncio, Teodoro, Gabrielly Cristina, Ribeiro, Juliana Silva, Stringhetta, Giovanna Rodrigues, dos Santos Fernandes, Carlos Eurico, Filho, Ruy Alberto Caetano Corrêa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study aimed to evaluate the performance of Nile tilapia, freshwater shrimp, lettuce, and watercress in an aquaponic system used in conjunction with biofloc technology. Experimental units consisted of an aquaponic module comprising two containers, one to accommodate vegetables (500 L media-filled bed with gravel) and the other to stock fish and shrimps (1000 L rearing tank). The experiment was carried out in a randomized complete block design with two treatments [an aquaponic system with clear water (ASCW) and an aquaponic system with biofloc technology (ASBFT)] and two blocks (periods). Each treatment had three replicates within each block, totaling six experimental units per block. The final weights of Nile tilapia (ASCW = 546.0 g; ASBFT: 565.0 g), freshwater shrimp (ASCW = 18.82 g; ASBFT: 18.44 g), and vegetable biomass (ASCW: 1.10 kg/m2 of lettuce and 1.57 kg/m2 of watercress; ASBFT: 0.94 kg/m2 of lettuce and 1.98 kg/m2 of watercress) did not differ significantly between the two treatments. Similarly, there were no significant differences between treatments with respect to other zootechnical performance variables of the evaluated organisms. There was, however, a greater (P 
ISSN:0044-8486
1873-5622
DOI:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2022.737916