PM2.5 concentrations forecasting in Beijing through deep learning with different inputs, model structures and forecast time
Timely and accurate air quality forecasting is of great significance for prevention and mitigation of air pollution. However, most of the previous forecasting models only considered either temporal or spatial prediction. The effects of different inputs, model structures and leading hours on the mode...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Atmospheric pollution research 2021-09, Vol.12 (9), p.101168, Article 101168 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Timely and accurate air quality forecasting is of great significance for prevention and mitigation of air pollution. However, most of the previous forecasting models only considered either temporal or spatial prediction. The effects of different inputs, model structures and leading hours on the model performance were still less investigated. In this study, three kinds of deep learning neural networks (the long short-term memory (LSTM), the convolutional neural networks (CNN), and CNN-LSTM) were developed for 1- to 24-h forecasting of spatiotemporal PM2.5 concentrations. The back propagation neural network (BPNN) was employed as the control model. Three types of input data (previous PM2.5 concentrations plus meteorological data, air quality data and the six most correlated variables, respectively) at multiple stations in Beijing from 2015 to 2016 were employed for model development. The results showed that PM2.5 concentrations in the past hours, hybrid air quality indexes or other pollutant concentrations, and wind speed can be used as good candidate predictors. For the 1-h forecasting, the LSTM and the CNN-LSTM with the most correlated variables were the best models with top 2 performance. For the 2- to 24-h forecasting, the LSTM was the optimal model for forecasting over 12 h while the CNN-LSTM was generally better for forecasting within 12 h. This study demonstrated that deep learning outperformed shallow learning models in hourly PM2.5 forecasting and suggested that optimizing the input and structure of the model helped to improve the performance of multiple-hour PM2.5 forecasting.
•The 1- to 24-h PM2.5 forecasting models using deep learning are developed.•LSTM, CNN, CNN-LSTM and BPNN are compared.•Effects of different inputs, model structures and forecast time are analyzed.•For 1-h forecasting, LSTM and CNN-LSTM with most correlated inputs are optimal.•For 2- to 24-h forecasting, LSTM is overall optimal. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1309-1042 1309-1042 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.apr.2021.101168 |