Ewes prefer subordinate rather than dominant rams as sexual partners

•Ewes moved more frequently toward subordinate than dominant tethered rams.•Ewes remained longer time close to subordinate than dominant rams.•Subordinate rams mounted and mated estrous ewes more than dominant rams.•One-fourth of the ewes mated exclusively subordinate rams, others mated both rams.•W...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied animal behaviour science 2021-05, Vol.238, p.105306, Article 105306
Hauptverfasser: Díaz, Arisvet, Orihuela, Agustín, Aguirre, Virginio, Clemente, Neftalí, Pedernera, Mariana, Flores-Pérez, Iván, Vázquez, Reyes, Ungerfeld, Rodolfo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Ewes moved more frequently toward subordinate than dominant tethered rams.•Ewes remained longer time close to subordinate than dominant rams.•Subordinate rams mounted and mated estrous ewes more than dominant rams.•One-fourth of the ewes mated exclusively subordinate rams, others mated both rams.•When estrous ewes can choose, they select subordinate rather than dominant rams. When rams and ewes interact freely, dominant rams perform the greatest number of copulations. However, the sexual preference of the female might influence the final distribution of ejaculations, and preference for subordinate rams could be evolutionary advantageous. To determine the sexual preference of the ewe for dominant (DOM) or subordinate (SUB) rams when rams’ activity is restricted, 28 ewes and 8 rams were used. Rams were classified into DOM and SUB by competition in pairs for an estrous ewe and were kept in dyads until the end of the experiment. Ewes were induced into estrus using progestagen-impregnated intravaginal sponges, and 24 h after sponge withdrawal, the sexual preference of the ewe for DOM or SUM rams was determined individually. Both rams were tethered with a 4 m long lasso in opposite corners of a 4m × 12m pen, and all the interactions were video-recorded. The test was repeated with seven ewes for each dyad of rams. The evaluation period started when the ewe allowed her first mount and ended with the last. At the end of each test, each ewe was removed from the pen and the location of the rams were exchanged. The time the ewe received the first to the last mating averaged 16:55 ± 1:25 h:min. Overall, ewes entered more times and remained longer in the zone of the SUB (entrances: 68.9 vs 29.1; pooled SEM = 9.0; P = 0.001; time into the zone: 3.66 ± 0.56 h vs 1.04 ± 0.51 h; P=
ISSN:0168-1591
1872-9045
DOI:10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105306