Agrivoltaics analysis in a techno-economic framework: Understanding why agrivoltaics on rice will always be profitable

•Techno-economic model and analysis of bifacial agrivoltaics (AV) with paddy rice.•Performance indicator of AV is economics driven—not land equivalent ratio (LER)•Horizontal E/W AV layout has more economic gain than tilted N/S and vertical E/W.•Net profit from AVs will be 22–115 times higher than co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied energy 2022-10, Vol.323, p.119560, Article 119560
Hauptverfasser: Sojib Ahmed, M., Rezwan Khan, M., Haque, Anisul, Ryyan Khan, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Techno-economic model and analysis of bifacial agrivoltaics (AV) with paddy rice.•Performance indicator of AV is economics driven—not land equivalent ratio (LER)•Horizontal E/W AV layout has more economic gain than tilted N/S and vertical E/W.•Net profit from AVs will be 22–115 times higher than conventional rice cultivation.•AV with bifacial vs. monofacial panels can boost profit by around 18 to 35% Agrivoltaics (AV) promises sustainable food and energy production from shared lands. While various literature studies AVs for leafy crops, there are limited equivalent works on AVs with major crops (e.g., rice, corn, wheat, etc.). Here, we present an end-to-end modeling framework to analyze location-specific AVs over paddy rice. We consider the local ambient conditions to find the spatially distributed rice production under panel arrays, the panel yield, and the economic aspects (costs, revenue, and profit) of the AV system. On a given land, solar energy has a far larger absolute profit than rice cultivation due to the 100s of folds higher investment possible in panels compared to paddy rice. Policy-level constraints are required to set a permissible reduction in rice for more energy. We find that, while maintaining 90% (or 80%) of the conventional rice production, the overall profit can be 22–115 (or 30–132) times higher than rice cultivation.
ISSN:0306-2619
1872-9118
DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119560