Value of power-to-gas as a flexibility option in integrated electricity and hydrogen markets

•Power-to-Gas (PtG) may offer flexibility to electricity markets with high shares of renewables.•This value is reduced when hydrogen produced by PtG is also demanded by other industries.•The benefits of this flexibility are lower than the costs of the PtG investments.•A carbon price of 150–700 euro/...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied energy 2021-12, Vol.304, p.117863, Article 117863
Hauptverfasser: Li, Xinyu, Mulder, Machiel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Power-to-Gas (PtG) may offer flexibility to electricity markets with high shares of renewables.•This value is reduced when hydrogen produced by PtG is also demanded by other industries.•The benefits of this flexibility are lower than the costs of the PtG investments.•A carbon price of 150–700 euro/ton is required to make PtG investments socially beneficial. This paper analyzes the economic potential of Power-to-Gas (PtG) as a source of flexibility in electricity markets with both high shares of renewables and high external demand for hydrogen. The contribution of this paper is that it develops and applies a short-term (hourly) partial equilibrium model of integrated electricity and hydrogen markets, including markets for green certificates, while using a welfare-economic framework to assess the market outcomes. We find that strongly increasing the share of renewable electricity makes electricity prices much more volatile, while the presence of PtG reduces this price volatility. However, a large demand for hydrogen from outside the electricity sector reduces the impact of PtG on the volatility of electricity prices. In a scenario with a high external hydrogen demand, PtG can deliver positive benefits for some groups as it can provide hydrogen at lower costs than Steam Methane Reforming (SMR) during hours when electricity prices are low, but these positive welfare effects are outweighed by the fixed costs of PtG assets plus the costs of replacing a less expensive energy carrier (natural gas) with a more expensive one (hydrogen). Investments in PtG are profitable from a social-welfare perspective when the induced reduction in carbon emissions is valued at 150–750 euro/ton. Hence, at lower carbon prices, PtG can only become a valuable provider of flexibility when installation costs are significantly reduced and conversion efficiencies of electrolysers increased.
ISSN:0306-2619
1872-9118
DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117863