Research on the method of quantitative evaluating material hardness and tensile strength by critically refracted longitudinal wave

Hardness and tensile strength are the important parameters to assess the performance mechanical materials, there are many challenges to evaluate mechanical properties of materials by ultrasonic testing method. In this paper, high-precision critically refracted longitudinal wave measurement system wa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied acoustics 2020-02, Vol.159, p.107105, Article 107105
Hauptverfasser: Men, Ping, Dong, Shiyun, Kang, Xueliang, Yan, Shixing, Cheng, Zhiyuan, Lv, Ruiyang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Hardness and tensile strength are the important parameters to assess the performance mechanical materials, there are many challenges to evaluate mechanical properties of materials by ultrasonic testing method. In this paper, high-precision critically refracted longitudinal wave measurement system was set up, ultrasonic wave propagation time of different heat treated 45 steel calibration specimens were measured by double probes method, and ultrasonic velocity was calculated. The distance between transmitting probe and receiving probe was changed to look for optimum distance for measuring critically refracted longitudinal wave velocity, on the above basis, the effects of different microstructure for velocity were studied. The mapping relationship among material hardness, tensile strength, microstructure and critically refracted longitudinal wave velocity were obtained, and calibration models for evaluating the hardness and tensile strength were established and verified. To further reduce the tensile strength prediction error, the hardness and tensile strength of 45 steel calibration specimens was built up, combined hardness calibration model, improved tensile strength calibration model was obtained. The hardness and tensile strength prediction error by the calibration model basically meets the error requirement of 10% for engineering application.
ISSN:0003-682X
1872-910X
DOI:10.1016/j.apacoust.2019.107105