Neutronic and thermal hydraulic analysis of a PWR fuel assembly using uranium mononitride

•Use of uranium mononitride fuel in PWR.•Neutronic and Thermal Hydraulic analysis using SCALE 6.0 and STHIRP codes.•Simulation of a typical PWR fuel assembly to compare the physical parameters of UO2 and UN fuels.•The largest thermal conductivity of uranium mononitride contributes to lowest fuel temperature.•The UN fuel presents highest production of transuranic elements and considerable 14C production during the fuel burnup. The nitride fuel is currently considered as a material to replacement of uranium dioxide in Light Water Reactors (LWR), mainly due to its higher thermal conductivity when compared with the oxide fuels and similar melting point. This behavior may contribute to larger heat conduction in the fuel assemblies and contributes to increase the safety margins to fuel melting during operation. In this way, the present work aims to contribute to studies on the use of uranium mononitride (UN) in LWRs. Neutronic and thermal hydraulic analysis were performed for a typical assembly of Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) using uranium dioxide (UO2) and uranium mononitride (UN) fuels. The SCALE 6.0 (Standardized Computer Analyses for Licensing Evaluation – version 6.0) and STHIRP (Thermal Hydraulic Simulation of Research Reactors) codes were used to calculate the neutronic and thermal hydraulic parameters, respectively. The goal is to verify the possible use of UN in a PWR. Comparing the evaluated fuels, the largest thermal conductivity of UN contributes to largest heat conduction in the pellet zone and to lowest fuel temperature. However, the UN presents highest production of transuranic elements and considerable 14C production into UN during the burnup. Results of neutronic and thermal hydraulic parameters behavior for both fuels are presented in details in this work as well as carefully analyzed.