Greenhouse gases fluxes and carbon cycle in agroecosystems under humid continental climate conditions

Few complex studies of greenhouse gas (GHG: carbon dioxide, CO2; methane, CH4; nitrous oxide, N2O) fluxes and carbon cycle components were carried out on the geographical territory of Eastern Europe and represented in world databases. Most of the investigations had focused on particular problems of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agriculture, ecosystems & environment ecosystems & environment, 2023-08, Vol.352, p.108502, Article 108502
Hauptverfasser: Sukhoveeva, Olga, Karelin, Dmitry, Lebedeva, Tatiana, Pochikalov, Alexander, Ryzhkov, Oleg, Suvorov, Gennady, Zolotukhin, Alipiy
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Few complex studies of greenhouse gas (GHG: carbon dioxide, CO2; methane, CH4; nitrous oxide, N2O) fluxes and carbon cycle components were carried out on the geographical territory of Eastern Europe and represented in world databases. Most of the investigations had focused on particular problems of carbon and nitrogen pools and fluxes, or had covered a narrow range of ecosystems. Therefore, the idea of this research was to carry out a multi-disciplinary study of carbon fluxes and pools in the sector of agriculture and land use – one of the main sources of GHG – in regions with humid continental climate that are the most affected by current climate change. Our work was aimed at solving the problem of quantifying GHG fluxes and carbon pools in crop and livestock production, analyzing the reasons for their formation and possible absorption pathways at three locations in the European part of Russia in the cold continental climate zone. The study examined both agricultural and natural ecosystems; field measurements, laboratory analyses, and simulation modelling techniques were applied. The sites included seven types of ecosystems: croplands, pastures, hayfields, fallows, forests, stockyards, and compost piles. Livestock facilities are potent sources of three main biogenic GHG (0.42 − 9.27 g C-CO2 m-2 h-1; 2.43 − 783.51 mg C-CH4 m-2 h-1; 0.01 − 1.49 mg N-N2O m-2 h-1); whereas croplands, hayfields and forests can absorb methane (from −1.10 to −118.2 μg C-CH4 m-2 h-1), as well as pastures, hayfields, fallows and forests are weak sinks of nitrous oxide (from −0.10 to −4.57 μg N-N2O m-2 h-1). Ecosystems were ranked using a non-parametric test by increasing rate of CO2 emission from soil in the following order: croplands (0.06 − 0.24 g C-CO2 m-2 h-1) ≤ hayfields (0.06 − 0.25 g C-CO2 m-2 h-1) ≤ pastures (0.06 − 0.22 g C-CO2 m-2 h-1) = fallows (0.13 − 0.26 g C-CO2 m-2 h-1) = forests (0.16 − 0.30 g CO2 m-2 h-1) ≤ stockyards (0.42 − 1.57 g CO2 m-2 h-1)
ISSN:0167-8809
1873-2305
DOI:10.1016/j.agee.2023.108502