Robust well-balanced method with flow resistance terms for accurate wetting and drying modeling in shallow water simulations

•A wetting and drying method based on negative-depth method is developed.•This method incorporates flow resistance terms into the momentum equation to describe the flow resistance.•The flow resistance on the exposed bed is close to infinity while the flow resistance in fluid area is equal to 0.•This...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Advances in water resources 2024-09, Vol.191, p.104760, Article 104760
Hauptverfasser: Lu, Lingjiang, Chen, Yongcan, Li, Manjie, Zhang, Hong, Liu, Zhaowei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•A wetting and drying method based on negative-depth method is developed.•This method incorporates flow resistance terms into the momentum equation to describe the flow resistance.•The flow resistance on the exposed bed is close to infinity while the flow resistance in fluid area is equal to 0.•This model performs well in tracking the moving water front and yielding precise results.•Compared with existing methods, the novel method exhibits broader applicability and significant enhancements in mass conservation, robustness, and computational efficiency. Hydrodynamic simulations in shallow water environments require careful consideration of the Wetting and Drying (WD) processes, which poses challenges to accurately modeling moving boundaries. This study introduces a novel method called the flow resistance method (FRM), which builds upon the foundation of the Negative-Depth Method (NDM) to tackle the intricacies of the moving boundary problem. Inspired by the Navier-Stokes/Brinkman (NSB) model from porous media theory, FRM incorporates a continuous function related to additional flow resistance that is proportional to the flow velocity. This approach facilitates a seamless transition between the exposed bed and fluid area wherein the additional flow resistance becomes 0 within the fluid area and approaches infinity in the exposed bed. Consequently, FRM adeptly and implicitly manages the moving boundary problem, causing a rapid decay of flow velocity to 0 in the exposed bed. In order to test the performance of FRM, four typical numerical experiments were conducted, along with an examination of a real-life case. Accuracy, robustness, and computational efficiency were assessed as key performance indicators. The simulations demonstrate that FRM adeptly tracks the moving water front, yielding precise results. Furthermore, when compared to established methods such as the Element Removal Method (ERM) and NDM, FRM exhibits broader applicability and achieves significant enhancements in the key performance indicators. These findings underscore the promising potential and broad applications of FRM in the field. [Display omitted]
ISSN:0309-1708
1872-9657
DOI:10.1016/j.advwatres.2024.104760