Improving assessment and progress monitoring in alcohol use disorder: An implementation evaluation of the instant assessment and personalised feedback system (iAx)

•Best practice guidelines recommend the use of standardised assessment instruments.•Due to various barriers, many practitioners do not routinely use them.•iAx was designed to electronically administer standardised assessment instruments.•iAx implementation improved assessment practices with patients...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Addictive behaviors 2022-12, Vol.135, p.107438, Article 107438
Hauptverfasser: Kidd, Chloe, Connor, Jason P., F. X. Feeney, Gerald, Gullo, Matthew J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Best practice guidelines recommend the use of standardised assessment instruments.•Due to various barriers, many practitioners do not routinely use them.•iAx was designed to electronically administer standardised assessment instruments.•iAx implementation improved assessment practices with patients with AUD. When treating patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD), best practice guidelines recommend the use of standardised assessment instruments to obtain reliable information about psychological symptoms and functioning to inform treatment. Due to time constraints and administrative burden, many mental health practitioners do not routinely use standardised assessments. To overcome these barriers, an instant assessment and feedback system (iAx) was developed that electronically administers standardised instruments. Responses are instantly scored and benchmarked against clinical norms for immediate interpretation. This allows for timely assessment and feedback. The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation of the iAx system at a specialist alcohol and drug outpatient unit in a public hospital. Baseline (pre-iAx implementation; paper-and-pencil assessments) and follow-up (post-iAx implementation) clinical audits collated records from 313 patients with AUD across 2,616 treatment sessions. Multilevel modelling was used to determine if use of standardised instruments increased post-iAx implementation. Post-iAx implementation, there was a significant increase in the probability of using standardised assessments during the initial assessment and throughout treatment (ps 
ISSN:0306-4603
1873-6327
DOI:10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107438