Predictors of electronic nicotine product quit attempts and cessation: Analysis of waves 3 and 4 of the PATH study

•51.7% of adult electronic nicotine product (ENP) users made a quit attempt.•Of those who made a quit attempt, 68.4% successfully quit using ENPs.•Interest in quitting, and using non-combustibles and cannabis predicted quit attempts.•Greater perceived risk of ENPs predicted successful ENP cessation....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Addictive behaviors 2022-11, Vol.134, p.107419, Article 107419
Hauptverfasser: Krishnan, Nandita, Berg, Carla J., Elmi, Angelo, Klemperer, Elias M., Sherman, Scott E., Abroms, Lorien C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•51.7% of adult electronic nicotine product (ENP) users made a quit attempt.•Of those who made a quit attempt, 68.4% successfully quit using ENPs.•Interest in quitting, and using non-combustibles and cannabis predicted quit attempts.•Greater perceived risk of ENPs predicted successful ENP cessation.•Greater self-efficacy and current smoking predicted quit attempts and cessation. Identifying theory-based predictors of electronic nicotine product (ENP) quit attempts and cessation can guide the development of effective vaping cessation interventions, which are currently limited. This study examined predictors of ENP quit attempts and cessation among adult ENP users. Using data from wave 3 (W3; 2015–2016) current established ENP users in the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health study, we used multivariable logistic regression to identify predictors of (i) wave 4 (W4; 2016–2018) quit attempts (unweighted n = 1,135); and (ii) W4 cessation among those who made a quit attempt (unweighted n = 610). Predictors included Social Cognitive Theory (SCT)-based cognitive (interest in quitting, self-efficacy to quit, outcome expectancies, risk perception), behavioral (smoking status, and use of combustibles, non-combustibles, cannabis, and alcohol), and socio-environmental (perceived disapproval, household rules, exposure to advertising) factors. Between W3 and W4, 51.7% of W3 ENP users made a quit attempt. Among those who tried quitting, 68.4% stopped using ENPs. SCT-based predictors of ENP quit attempts included higher interest in quitting ENPs (aOR = 1.18), greater self-efficacy to quit ENPs (aOR = 1.31), and currently using cigarettes (vs non-smoker; aOR = 1.71), non-combustibles (aOR = 2.25), and cannabis (aOR = 1.80). Predictors of ENP cessation included greater self-efficacy to quit ENPs (aOR = 1.33), greater perceived risk of ENPs (aOR = 1.35), and being a current smoker (vs non-smoker; aOR = 3.28). ENP cessation interventions should address cognitive factors, particularly self-efficacy, as it predicted quit attempts and cessation. Cigarette smoking among dual users should be monitored and addressed to ensure that those who quit using ENPs do not maintain cigarette use.
ISSN:0306-4603
1873-6327
DOI:10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107419