A meta-analysis of factors affecting acceptance of information technology in auditing

•The most important factor in accepting technology in auditing from the organizational perspective is technology cost-benefit.•In adopting technology, external auditors are more affected by organizational factors than internal auditors.•In adopting technology in audit, perceived usefulness is more i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of accounting information systems 2023-06, Vol.49, p.100608, Article 100608
Hauptverfasser: Afsay, Akram, Tahriri, Arash, Rezaee, Zabihollah
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•The most important factor in accepting technology in auditing from the organizational perspective is technology cost-benefit.•In adopting technology, external auditors are more affected by organizational factors than internal auditors.•In adopting technology in audit, perceived usefulness is more important in developed countries.•Acceptance of audit technologies in developing countries is more influenced by perceived ease of use and organizational factors. Technology advancements provide opportunities for auditors to use new tools in the audit process. This study presents a synthesis of technology-related auditing research to identify factors affecting the use of technology in auditing. We analyze 88 studies in identifying 21 factors relevant to technology acceptance in auditing based on country of origin (developed or developing), user type (external or internal), type of technology (traditional or advanced), firm size (Big 4 or non-Big 4), and publication time (before and after 2013). Our results show that the most important factors in accepting technology from an individual perspective are facilitator conditions, perceived usefulness, and understanding of ease of use. Technology acceptance factors relevant to an organizational perspective are cost-benefit technology, competitive pressure, company readiness, and matching technology-task. Results suggest that perceived usefulness and subjective norm are more important in developed countries and Big 4 audit firms, while auditors in developing countries and non-Big 4 audit firms are more influenced by perceived ease of use, facilitating conditions, and organizational factors. Adopting traditional technologies is also more influenced by understanding the ease of use, subjective norms, and top management support than advanced technologies. This study contributes to the literature by assessing technology acceptance factors in auditing and thus provides policy, practice, and research implications.
ISSN:1467-0895
1873-4723
DOI:10.1016/j.accinf.2022.100608