Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada v. Entertainment Software Association: Decision of the Supreme Court of Canada 15 July 2022 – Case No. 2022 SCC 30
The Copyright Act does not require that users pay two royalties to access works online. The reading of Sec. 2.4(1.1) of the Copyright Act that is most consistent with its text, structure, purpose, and context is that Sec. 2.4(1.1) clarifies that (1) Sec. 3(1)(f) applies to on-demand streams, and (2)...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 2023-04, Vol.54 (4), p.585-586 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The Copyright Act does not require that users pay two royalties to access works online.
The reading of Sec. 2.4(1.1) of the Copyright Act that is most consistent with its text, structure, purpose, and context is that Sec. 2.4(1.1) clarifies that (1) Sec. 3(1)(f) applies to on-demand streams, and (2) a work is performed as soon as it is made available for on-demand streaming.
If a work is streamed or made available for on-demand streaming, the author’s performance right is engaged. If a work is downloaded, the author’s reproduction right is engaged. If a work is made available for downloading, the author’s right to authorize reproductions is engaged. If a work is downloaded or made available for downloading, Sec. 3(1)(f) is not engaged. If a work is made available for streaming and later streamed, Sec. 3(1)(f) is only engaged once. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0018-9855 2195-0237 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s40319-023-01313-y |