Betec Licht: Decision of the Court of Cassation of France (Cour de cassation) 7 October 2020 – Case No. 19-11.258

Betec Licht: Decision of the Court of Cassation of France (Cour de cassation) 7 October 2020 – Case No. 19-11.258

All the features of the combination claimed to underlie the originality of a work must be taken into account when assessing the necessary originality required for copyright protection. An action for unfair competition may be based on facts which are substantially identical to the facts alleged in an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 2021-05, Vol.52 (5), p.647-649
Hauptverfasser: Betec Licht AG and Mr. U.D.O. v. Comptoir électrique français SASU, Société Immobilière et d’exploitation de l’Hôtel Majestic SA, Comptoir general d’éclairage (trading under the trade name Lucera SA), and Grupo Lineas TC Intellectual Property Code, Arts. L. 111-1, L. 112-1, Civil Code, Art. 1382 (now Art. 1240)
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Decision • Copyright Law
Intellectual Property
IT Law
Law
Law and Criminolgy
Media Law
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:All the features of the combination claimed to underlie the originality of a work must be taken into account when assessing the necessary originality required for copyright protection. An action for unfair competition may be based on facts which are substantially identical to the facts alleged in an action for intellectual property infringement, which has been rejected for the absence of a property right.
ISSN:0018-9855
2195-0237
DOI:10.1007/s40319-021-01061-x