Le Point – Marianne: Decision of the Supreme Court (Cour de cassation) 22 May 2019 – Case No. 18-12.718 (ECLI:FR:CCASS:2019:C100469)

Le Point – Marianne: Decision of the Supreme Court (Cour de cassation) 22 May 2019 – Case No. 18-12.718 (ECLI:FR:CCASS:2019:C100469)

According to Art. L122-5, 4° of the Intellectual Property Code, the author cannot prohibit parody, pastiche and caricature, observing the rules of the genre. The notion of “parody”, in the sense of Art. 5(3)(k) of Directive 2001/29/, is an autonomous concept of EU law and is not subject to the condi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 2020-03, Vol.51 (3), p.386-388
Hauptverfasser: Intellectual Property Code, Arts. L111-1, L112-1, European Convention on Human Rights, Art. 10 combined with its First Additional Protocol, Art. 1, Directive 2001/29/EC, Art. 5(k)
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Decision • Copyright Law
Intellectual Property
IT Law
Law
Law and Criminolgy
Media Law
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:According to Art. L122-5, 4° of the Intellectual Property Code, the author cannot prohibit parody, pastiche and caricature, observing the rules of the genre. The notion of “parody”, in the sense of Art. 5(3)(k) of Directive 2001/29/, is an autonomous concept of EU law and is not subject to the conditions according to which a parody should mention the source of the parodied work or relate to the original work itself.
ISSN:0018-9855
2195-0237
DOI:10.1007/s40319-020-00920-3