Iron recovery from the waste generated during the cutting of granite
Metallic iron is present in the waste left when granite blocks are cut. Thus, the purpose of this study was to characterize this waste using chemical and particle size analyses. To achieve this, X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy coupled with electron back-scattered diffraction were...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of environmental science and technology (Tehran) 2015-02, Vol.12 (2), p.465-472 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Metallic iron is present in the waste left when granite blocks are cut.
Thus, the purpose of this study was to characterize this waste using
chemical and particle size analyses. To achieve this, X-ray diffraction
and scanning electron microscopy coupled with electron back-scattered
diffraction were used. To find the method with the best metallic iron
recovery from the waste of ornamental rock, three distinct methods were
examined: magnetic separation, table concentration and cyclone
processing. The first method involved three steps: (1) use of a wet
high-intensity magnetic separator, where only the equipment's
remaining magnetic field was present; (2) the material from the first
step was then submitted to separation again, this time using a magnet
for rare earth particles; and (3) this material after two separation
processes was finally submitted to ferromagnetic separation. The second
method used a concentration table set at various inclinations,
oscillation frequencies and wash flow rates. Meanwhile, for the third
method, the cyclone tests, only the water pressure was varied. After
each test, a chemical analysis was performed to determine the metallic
iron present in each sample. The tests revealed that magnetic
separation presents the best results. Using this technique, a ferrous
concentrate with 93 % metallic iron content and a granite concentrate
with only 0.6 % metallic iron were obtained. On the other hand, in the
table concentrator tests, the ferrous concentrate only had a metallic
concentration of 13.6 %. In separation by the cyclone processing, the
product barely contained metallic iron (7.2 % maximum). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1735-1472 1735-2630 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s13762-013-0418-6 |