Acute type A aortic syndromes: outcomes are independent of aortic root/valve management
Purpose Clinical outcomes following various surgical intervention strategies for aortic root and valve pathology during repair of acute type A aortic syndromes were studied and compared. Methods From 2004 to 2019, 634 patients underwent acute type A aortic repair. Patients were divided into 4 groups...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2024-03, Vol.40 (2), p.123-132 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
Clinical outcomes following various surgical intervention strategies for aortic root and valve pathology during repair of acute type A aortic syndromes were studied and compared.
Methods
From 2004 to 2019, 634 patients underwent acute type A aortic repair. Patients were divided into 4 groups: Valve Resuspension (
n
= 456), Isolated Valve Replacement (AVR) (
n
= 24), Valve and Root Replacement (ROOT) (
n
= 97), and Valve Sparing Root Replacement (VSRR) (
n
= 57). The primary endpoint was midterm survival and multivariable risk factor analysis was performed.
Results
The mean age was 55.4 ± 13 years, 424 (67%) were male, and overall early mortality was 12%. Early mortality was 13%, 8%, 11%, and 7% for the Valve Resuspension, AVR, ROOT, and VSRR groups respectively,
p
= 0.43. Five-year survival was 74%, 86%, 73%, and 84% for the Valve Resuspension, AVR, ROOT, and VSRR groups respectively,
p
= 0.46. There was no difference in late stroke, renal failure, heart block, and late bleeding (
p
> 0.05 for all). At late follow-up, AVR and ROOT patients had a higher mean gradient versus Valve Resuspension and VSRR patients,
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0970-9134 0973-7723 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s12055-023-01602-8 |