Efficacy of thermal ablation in benign non-functioning solid thyroid nodule: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background Image-guided thermal ablations are commonly used in the treatment of thyroid nodules. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and laser ablation are the most commonly used. Here we aimed to obtain solid evidence of the long-term efficacy of RFA and laser ablation in benign non-functioning solid thy...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Endocrine 2020, Vol.67 (1), p.35-43
Hauptverfasser: Trimboli, Pierpaolo, Castellana, Marco, Sconfienza, Luca Maria, Virili, Camilla, Pescatori, Lorenzo Carlo, Cesareo, Roberto, Giorgino, Francesco, Negro, Roberto, Giovanella, Luca, Mauri, Giovanni
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Image-guided thermal ablations are commonly used in the treatment of thyroid nodules. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and laser ablation are the most commonly used. Here we aimed to obtain solid evidence of the long-term efficacy of RFA and laser ablation in benign non-functioning solid thyroid nodules (BNFSTN). Methods PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched until March 2019. Studies reporting the effectiveness of RFA or laser ablation in patients with BNFSTN in terms of volume reduction rate (VRR), compressive symptoms and cosmetic concerns were included. Complications were also assessed. Results Out of 963 papers, 12 studies on RFA and 12 on laser ablation were included, assessing 1186 and 2009 BNFSTNs, respectively. Overall, VRR at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months was 60%, 66%, 62%, and 53%. VRR of RFA was 68%, 75%, and 87%, respectively. VRR of laser ablation was 48%, 52%, 45%, and 44%, respectively. Baseline volume of nodules undergone RFA was significantly smaller compared to laser ablation (20.1 ± 22.4 versus 24.6 ± 23.6 ml; p  
ISSN:1355-008X
1559-0100
DOI:10.1007/s12020-019-02019-3