Philosophy of Doctrinal Classification: Kōyama Iwao and Mou Zongsan
Doctrinal classification or the panjiao 判教 system of Chinese Buddhism has been rediscovered and renewed in modern East Asian philosophy since both the Kyoto School and New Confucianism clarified the philosophical meaning of this intellectual tradition. The theoretical relation between these two mode...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Dao : a journal of comparative philosophy 2014-12, Vol.13 (4), p.453-468 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Doctrinal classification or the
panjiao
判教 system of Chinese Buddhism has been rediscovered and renewed in modern East Asian philosophy since both the Kyoto School and New Confucianism clarified the philosophical meaning of this intellectual tradition. The theoretical relation between these two modern reconsiderations, however, has not yet been studied. I analyze the theory of
panjiao
in K
ōyama
Iwao 高山岩男 (1905–1993) and M
ou
Zongsan 牟宗三 (1909–1995) so as to identify and extract, despite their apparent irrelevance, the same type of philosophical argument concerning the ontological character of
yuanjiao
圓教. My analysis shows that Mou’s distinction between the “two-door mind” paradigm and Buddhistic ontology in his interpretation of Tiantai 天台 Buddhism corresponds to Kōyama’s distinction between an idealistic system and the existential turn in his generalized
panjiao
system. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1540-3009 1569-7274 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11712-014-9397-7 |