A Case for Modal Fragmentalism
The idea of fragmentalism has been proposed by Kit Fine as a non-standard view of tense realism. This paper examines a modal version of the view, called modal fragmentalism, which combines genuine realism and realism of modality. Modal fragmentalism has been recently discussed by Iaquinto. But unlik...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Philosophia (Ramat Gan) 2021-07, Vol.49 (3), p.1309-1328 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The idea of fragmentalism has been proposed by Kit Fine as a non-standard view of tense realism. This paper examines a modal version of the view, called modal fragmentalism, which combines genuine realism and realism of modality. Modal fragmentalism has been recently discussed by Iaquinto. But unlike Iaquinto, who primarily focused on possibilities
de re
, in this paper, we focus on expressions of possibilities
de dicto
. We argue that the chief idea of modal realism should be that different worlds are distinguished not just in terms of how things
are
differently with respect to each world, but also in terms of how things
could have been
differently with respect to each world. This demands a realism-oriented semantics for suppositional contents, and more specifically, for conditionals. By deploying a multidimensional semantics for conditionals, we show that there are good reasons to consider modal fragmentalism as a serious approach in metaphysics, which shares many similarities with the fragmentalism of tense. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0048-3893 1574-9274 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11406-020-00284-5 |