Reactor production of 32P for medical applications: an assessment of 32S(n,p)32P and 31P(n,γ)32P methods

The article describes a comparative study carried out on the reactor production of 32 P by two different processes, namely, 32 S(n,p) 32 P and 31 P(n,γ) 32 P with a view to determine the merits and bottlenecks of each method and assess the usefulness of 32 P obtained from each of the processes. In a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of radioanalytical and nuclear chemistry 2014-08, Vol.301 (2), p.555-565
Hauptverfasser: Vimalnath, K. V., Shetty, Priyalata, Rajeswari, A., Chirayil, Viju, Chakraborty, Sudipta, Dash, Ashutosh
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The article describes a comparative study carried out on the reactor production of 32 P by two different processes, namely, 32 S(n,p) 32 P and 31 P(n,γ) 32 P with a view to determine the merits and bottlenecks of each method and assess the usefulness of 32 P obtained from each of the processes. In a typical batch, 250 g of elemental sulfur when irradiated at a fast neutron flux of ~8 × 10 11  n cm −2  s −1 for 60 days, after chemical processing provided about 150 GBq(4.05Ci) of 32 P having specific activity of 200TBq(5500Ci)/mmole. On the other hand, irradiation of 0.35 g of red phosphorus at a fast neutron flux of ~7.5 × 10 13  n cm −2  s −1 for a period of 60 days gave 75 GBq(2.02Ci) of 32 P of specific activity 7 GBq(190mCi)/mol -1 . While the specific activity of 32 P obtained from 32 S(n,p) 32 P is superior to that obtained from the 3l P(n,γ) 32 P process, the requirement of elaborate target processing steps involving distillation and purification emerged as a deterrent that limits its widespread adaptability. Both the production routes offer 32 P of acceptable quality amenable for medical applications although their specific activity differs.
ISSN:0236-5731
1588-2780
DOI:10.1007/s10967-014-3115-0