Reactor production of 32P for medical applications: an assessment of 32S(n,p)32P and 31P(n,γ)32P methods
The article describes a comparative study carried out on the reactor production of 32 P by two different processes, namely, 32 S(n,p) 32 P and 31 P(n,γ) 32 P with a view to determine the merits and bottlenecks of each method and assess the usefulness of 32 P obtained from each of the processes. In a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of radioanalytical and nuclear chemistry 2014-08, Vol.301 (2), p.555-565 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The article describes a comparative study carried out on the reactor production of
32
P by two different processes, namely,
32
S(n,p)
32
P and
31
P(n,γ)
32
P with a view to determine the merits and bottlenecks of each method and assess the usefulness of
32
P obtained from each of the processes. In a typical batch, 250 g of elemental sulfur when irradiated at a fast neutron flux of ~8 × 10
11
n cm
−2
s
−1
for 60 days, after chemical processing provided about 150 GBq(4.05Ci) of
32
P having specific activity of 200TBq(5500Ci)/mmole. On the other hand, irradiation of 0.35 g of red phosphorus at a fast neutron flux of ~7.5 × 10
13
n cm
−2
s
−1
for a period of 60 days gave 75 GBq(2.02Ci) of
32
P of specific activity 7 GBq(190mCi)/mol
-1
. While the specific activity of
32
P obtained from
32
S(n,p)
32
P is superior to that obtained from the
3l
P(n,γ)
32
P process, the requirement of elaborate target processing steps involving distillation and purification emerged as a deterrent that limits its widespread adaptability. Both the production routes offer
32
P of acceptable quality amenable for medical applications although their specific activity differs. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0236-5731 1588-2780 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10967-014-3115-0 |