Experimental comparison of the relative yield of 3γ/2γ positron annihilation using semiconductor and scintillation detectors

The yield of three photon positron annihilation is measured using semiconductor and scintillation detectors in a comparison for applications in positron emission tomography, particularly in the exploitation of three photon positron annihilation imaging where good energy resolution and good efficienc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of radioanalytical and nuclear chemistry 2009-05, Vol.280 (2), p.315-318
Hauptverfasser: Alkhorayef, M., Abuelhia, E., Alzimami, K., Marouli, M., Chin, M. P. W., Spyrou, N. M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The yield of three photon positron annihilation is measured using semiconductor and scintillation detectors in a comparison for applications in positron emission tomography, particularly in the exploitation of three photon positron annihilation imaging where good energy resolution and good efficiency are required. In this experimental study four detectors, High-purity Germanium (HPGe), Sodium Iodide (NaI(Tl)), Lanthanum Chloride (LaCl 3 :10%Ce 3+ ) and Lanthanum Bromide (LaBr 3 :5%Ce 3+ ) were used. The peak-to-peak method was used with a 22 Na source to determine these yields. Aluminium was employed as a reference material as its high electron density reduces positronium formation and lifetimes. Teflon was also used in order to enhance the formation of ortho-positronium, since quenching is low, leading to increased three photon positron annihilation. The relative 3γ/2γ yields obtained were (3.04±0.11)·10 −2 , (2.17±0.11)·10 −2 , (3.26±0.10)·10 −2 and (2.03±0.11)·10 −2 for LaBr 3 :Ce, LaCl 3 :Ce, NaI(Tl) and HPGe detectors, respectively. Among these detectors LaBr 3 :Ce proved to be the detector of choice for three photon imaging applications as it has both good energy resolution and efficiency.
ISSN:0236-5731
1588-2780
DOI:10.1007/s10967-009-0519-3