Population pharmacodynamic model of the longitudinal FEV1 response to an inhaled long-acting anti-muscarinic in COPD patients

The precise assessment of the dose–response to bronchodilators in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is hindered by the low signal to noise ratio of the typical clinical endpoint FEV 1 . Kinetic-pharmacodynamic (K-PD) models which use time course of response over a range of doses...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics 2011-02, Vol.38 (1), p.105-119
Hauptverfasser: Wu, Kai, Looby, Michael, Pillai, Goonaseelan, Pinault, Gregory, Drollman, Anton Franz, Pascoe, Steve
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The precise assessment of the dose–response to bronchodilators in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is hindered by the low signal to noise ratio of the typical clinical endpoint FEV 1 . Kinetic-pharmacodynamic (K-PD) models which use time course of response over a range of doses are in principle suited for the assessment of the dose response relationship of pulmonary administered drugs. A K-PD model was successfully developed using the longitudinal FEV1 data collected in the clinical study for a novel bronchodilator X. A superposition of two cosine functions was selected to describe the circadian variability in FEV 1 at baseline. The onset (ka) and offset (kde) of drug action were described with first-order rate constants of 0.214/h and 0.141/h, respectively. Drug potency, EKD 50, was estimated as 6.56 μg/h, and the maximum response, Emax as 0.631 L. Between-subject variability for kde, EKD 50 and Emax were 65, 84.7 or 34.4% (expressed as coefficient variation). The model-based simulation predicted that for the same total daily dose of once-daily and twice-daily regimens, the trough FEV 1 response to a twice-daily regimen was higher, and the maximum FEV 1 response to once-daily regimen was higher, while the predicted average FEV 1 response was about the same.
ISSN:1567-567X
1573-8744
DOI:10.1007/s10928-010-9180-2