Intuitionistic Quantum Logic of an n-level System

A decade ago, Isham and Butterfield proposed a topos-theoretic approach to quantum mechanics, which meanwhile has been extended by Döring and Isham so as to provide a new mathematical foundation for all of physics. Last year, three of the present authors redeveloped and refined these ideas by combin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Foundations of physics 2009-07, Vol.39 (7), p.731-759
Hauptverfasser: Caspers, Martijn, Heunen, Chris, Landsman, Nicolaas P., Spitters, Bas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A decade ago, Isham and Butterfield proposed a topos-theoretic approach to quantum mechanics, which meanwhile has been extended by Döring and Isham so as to provide a new mathematical foundation for all of physics. Last year, three of the present authors redeveloped and refined these ideas by combining the C*-algebraic approach to quantum theory with the so-called internal language of topos theory (Heunen et al. in arXiv:0709.4364 ). The goal of the present paper is to illustrate our abstract setup through the concrete example of the C*-algebra M n (ℂ) of complex n × n matrices. This leads to an explicit expression for the pointfree quantum phase space Σ n and the associated logical structure and Gelfand transform of an n -level system. We also determine the pertinent non-probabilisitic state-proposition pairing (or valuation) and give a very natural topos-theoretic reformulation of the Kochen–Specker Theorem. In our approach, the nondistributive lattice ℘( M n (ℂ)) of projections in M n (ℂ) (which forms the basis of the traditional quantum logic of Birkhoff and von Neumann) is replaced by a specific distributive lattice of functions from the poset of all unital commutative C*-subalgebras C of M n (ℂ) to ℘( M n (ℂ)). The lattice is essentially the (pointfree) topology of the quantum phase space Σ n , and as such defines a Heyting algebra. Each element of corresponds to a “Bohrified” proposition, in the sense that to each classical context it associates a yes-no question (i.e. an element of the Boolean lattice ℘( C ) of projections in C ), rather than being a single projection as in standard quantum logic. Distributivity is recovered at the expense of the law of the excluded middle ( Tertium Non Datur ), whose demise is in our opinion to be welcomed, not just in intuitionistic logic in the spirit of Brouwer, but also in quantum logic in the spirit of von Neumann.
ISSN:0015-9018
1572-9516
DOI:10.1007/s10701-009-9308-7