Erratum to “Reformulating table constraints using functional dependencies—an application to explanation generation”
We had claimed that arc-consistency is preserved in a constraint reformulation relying on functional dependencies (Theorem 2 of Cambazard and O’Sullivan Constraints 13(3):385–406 ( 2008 )). We show that the statement of this theorem was too strong by providing a counter-example. However, the result...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Constraints : an international journal 2010, Vol.15 (1), p.145-147 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | We had claimed that arc-consistency is preserved in a constraint reformulation relying on functional dependencies (Theorem 2 of Cambazard and O’Sullivan Constraints 13(3):385–406 (
2008
)). We show that the statement of this theorem was too strong by providing a counter-example. However, the result holds for dependencies between pairs of variables, and more generally in restricted settings. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1383-7133 1572-9354 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10601-009-9081-4 |