Predicted and measured hydraulic conductivity of sand-sized crushed limestone

The hydraulic conductivity of 54 sand-sized crushed limestone materials was measured by conducting constant head tests in a rigid-wall permeameter and was estimated using six predictive equations requiring easily obtainable parameters. The gradations tested had effective grain size, D 10 , from 0.07...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bulletin of engineering geology and the environment 2021-02, Vol.80 (2), p.1875-1890
Hauptverfasser: Toumpanou, Ioanna C., Pantazopoulos, Ioannis A., Markou, Ioannis N., Atmatzidis, Dimitrios K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The hydraulic conductivity of 54 sand-sized crushed limestone materials was measured by conducting constant head tests in a rigid-wall permeameter and was estimated using six predictive equations requiring easily obtainable parameters. The gradations tested had effective grain size, D 10 , from 0.079 to 2.15 mm; uniformity coefficient, C u , from 1.19 to 15.79; and void ratio, e , from 0.42 to 0.76. The measured hydraulic conductivity had a range of about three orders of magnitude (3.4*10 −3 to 3.3 cm/s). Four of the predictive equations, based on the square of the effective grain size, D 10 2 , yielded closely grouped results differing by not more than a factor of 2. Long existing equations by Terzaghi ( 1925 ) and by Hazen ( 1892 ), adjusted for void ratio according to Taylor ( 1948 ), were found to have a high predictive efficiency with a ratio of predicted to measured values between 1/2 and 2 for 70% of the materials tested. The Kenney et al. ( 1984 ) equation, based on D 5 2 , was also efficient but underestimated measured values for 63% of all cases. The Kozeny–Carman equation (Taylor 1948 ; Chapuis 2012 ), based on specific surface, overestimated measurements for 90% of the tested materials by a factor of up to 3.
ISSN:1435-9529
1435-9537
DOI:10.1007/s10064-020-02032-1