Fe–O versus O–O bond cleavage in reactive iron peroxide intermediates of superoxide reductase

It is generally accepted that the catalytic cycles of superoxide reductases (SORs) and cytochromes P450 involve a ferric hydroperoxo intermediate at a mononuclear iron center with a coordination sphere consisting of four equatorial nitrogen ligands and one axial cysteine thiolate trans to the hydroperoxide. However, although SORs and P450s have similar intermediates, SORs selectively cleave the Fe–O bond and liberate peroxide, whereas P450s cleave the O–O bond to yield a high-valent iron center. This difference has attracted the interest of researchers, and is further explored here. Meta hybrid DFT (M06-2X) results for the reactivity of the putative peroxo/hydroperoxo reaction intermediates in the catalytic cycle of SORs were found to indicate a high-spin preference in all cases. An exploration of the energy profiles for Fe–O and O–O bond cleavage in all spin states in both ferric and ferrous models revealed that Fe–O bond cleavage always occurs more easily than O–O bond cleavage. While O–O bond cleavage appears to be thermodynamically and kinetically unfeasible in ferric hydrogen peroxide complexes, it could occur as a minor (significantly disfavored) side reaction in the interaction of ferrous SOR with hydrogen peroxide.