Development and validation of thin-layer chromatography and high-performance thin-layer chromatography methods for the simultaneous determination of linagliptin and empagliflozin in their co-formulated dosage form

A sensitive, simple and validated thin-layer chromatography (TLC) method (method A) and a high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC) method (method B) have been developed for the simultaneous determination of linagliptin (LNG) and empagliflozin (EMP) in laboratory prepared mixtures and in th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JPC. Journal of planar chromatography, modern TLC modern TLC, 2020-12, Vol.33 (6), p.647-661
Hauptverfasser: Rizk, Mohamed, Attia, Ali K., Mohamed, Heba Y., Elshahed, Mona S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A sensitive, simple and validated thin-layer chromatography (TLC) method (method A) and a high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC) method (method B) have been developed for the simultaneous determination of linagliptin (LNG) and empagliflozin (EMP) in laboratory prepared mixtures and in their co-formulated pharmaceutical preparations. Chromatographic separation has been done using TLC silica gel 60 F 254 aluminum plates (20 cm × 10 cm, 0.25 mm thickness) and the mobile phase consisting of chloroform‒methanol‒ammonia (33%) (9:1:0.1, V/V ) for method A. Chromatographic separation in method B was carried out using HPTLC nano-silica gel 60 F 254 glass plates (10 cm × 10 cm, 0.1 mm thickness) and the mobile phase consisting of chloroform‒methanol‒ammonia (25%) (10:1:0.1, V/V ). The optimized chromatographic conditions gave good peak shapes with good resolutions at acceptable R F values of 0.25 ± 0.01 for EMP, 0.56 ± 0.01 for LNG in method A, 0.31 ± 0.01 for EMP and 0.71 ± 0.01 for LNG in method B. Both methods were validated for linearity, accuracy, precision and specificity. The calibration plots were linear over a concentration range of 0.4‒10 µg/band with a correlation coefficient of 0.9998 for EMP and 0.2‒5.0 µg/band with a correlation coefficient of 0.9998 for LNG in method A. In method B, the linear range for calibration was 0.1‒5.0 µg/band with a correlation coefficient of 0.9999 for EMP and 0.05‒2.5 µg/band with a correlation coefficient of 0.9999 for LNG. The optimized methods were successfully applied for the determination of the studied drugs in laboratory prepared mixtures and in their co-formulated pharmaceutical preparations with no significant difference observed upon statistical comparison between the proposed and reported methods.
ISSN:0933-4173
1789-0993
DOI:10.1007/s00764-020-00074-5