Development and validation of thin-layer chromatography and high-performance thin-layer chromatography methods for the simultaneous determination of linagliptin and empagliflozin in their co-formulated dosage form
A sensitive, simple and validated thin-layer chromatography (TLC) method (method A) and a high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC) method (method B) have been developed for the simultaneous determination of linagliptin (LNG) and empagliflozin (EMP) in laboratory prepared mixtures and in th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | JPC. Journal of planar chromatography, modern TLC modern TLC, 2020-12, Vol.33 (6), p.647-661 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | A sensitive, simple and validated thin-layer chromatography (TLC) method (method A) and a high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC) method (method B) have been developed for the simultaneous determination of linagliptin (LNG) and empagliflozin (EMP) in laboratory prepared mixtures and in their co-formulated pharmaceutical preparations. Chromatographic separation has been done using TLC silica gel 60 F
254
aluminum plates (20 cm × 10 cm, 0.25 mm thickness) and the mobile phase consisting of chloroform‒methanol‒ammonia (33%) (9:1:0.1,
V/V
) for method A. Chromatographic separation in method B was carried out using HPTLC nano-silica gel 60 F
254
glass plates (10 cm × 10 cm, 0.1 mm thickness) and the mobile phase consisting of chloroform‒methanol‒ammonia (25%) (10:1:0.1,
V/V
). The optimized chromatographic conditions gave good peak shapes with good resolutions at acceptable
R
F
values of 0.25 ± 0.01 for EMP, 0.56 ± 0.01 for LNG in method A, 0.31 ± 0.01 for EMP and 0.71 ± 0.01 for LNG in method B. Both methods were validated for linearity, accuracy, precision and specificity. The calibration plots were linear over a concentration range of 0.4‒10 µg/band with a correlation coefficient of 0.9998 for EMP and 0.2‒5.0 µg/band with a correlation coefficient of 0.9998 for LNG in method A. In method B, the linear range for calibration was 0.1‒5.0 µg/band with a correlation coefficient of 0.9999 for EMP and 0.05‒2.5 µg/band with a correlation coefficient of 0.9999 for LNG. The optimized methods were successfully applied for the determination of the studied drugs in laboratory prepared mixtures and in their co-formulated pharmaceutical preparations with no significant difference observed upon statistical comparison between the proposed and reported methods. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0933-4173 1789-0993 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00764-020-00074-5 |