The Role of Load Control Modes in Determination of Mechanical Properties of Granite

Circumferential strain-control tests were suggested to obtain the complete stress–strain curves (SSCs) of intact rock. However, compression test performed by the axial strain-control loading is mostly used to obtain the strength parameters and the SSCs. The influences of load control modes on the mechanical behavior of rock have not been fully investigated and understood. In this study, triaxial compression tests are conducted on granite specimens loaded by using both axial strain-control and circumferential strain-control modes to examine influences of load control modes on the determined mechanical properties. The occurrence mechanism and influencing factors of class II behavior are studied, and the potential application of the class II SSC in the evaluation of brittle failure of hard rock is also discussed. Results show that the peak strength, elastic modulus and fracture angle are generally higher in the axial strain-control test than in the circumferential strain-control test, and the failure in the former is also more violent than the latter under the same confining pressure. The much lower and constant circumferential deformation rate applied in the circumferential strain-control test is the dominant factor that favors the recovery of the complete post-peak SSC. The lower measured values of strength and elastic modulus are also associated with the lower deformation rate in the circumferential strain-control test, with a higher degree of damage and cohesion weakening occurring inside the rock. The development of the class II SSC is attributed to the axial strain recovery during the release of the stored elastic energy, which is influenced by the ratio of elastic energy to dissipated energy in the pre-peak stage, and is also associated with the consumed energy with respect to plastic deformation or initiation and propagation of new cracks in the post-peak stage. The class II SSC can aid the differentiation of the energy accumulation and consumption of different brittle rocks, which are usually characterized by a more abrupt and larger stress drop in the axial strain-control test. It can then be used to evaluate the strain rockburst potential of a particular rock type.