A Meta-analysis of TAE/TACE Versus Emergency Surgery in the Treatment of Ruptured HCC

Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and safety of TAE/TACE versus emergency surgery (ES) for spontaneous rupture of HCC (rHCC). Methods Eight databases (Web of Science, Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrial.gov, Wanfang, CNKI and VIP) were searched to obtain all related literature from the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cardiovascular and interventional radiology 2020-09, Vol.43 (9), p.1263-1276
Hauptverfasser: Xu, Xinjian, Chen, Changsheng, Liu, Qiang, Huang, Xiangzhong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and safety of TAE/TACE versus emergency surgery (ES) for spontaneous rupture of HCC (rHCC). Methods Eight databases (Web of Science, Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrial.gov, Wanfang, CNKI and VIP) were searched to obtain all related literature from the inception dates to October 2019. Subgroup analyses based on the kind of study design and kind of embolization were conducted. Results Twenty-one studies comparing TAE/TACE with ES were eligible. A total of 974 rHCC participants (485 participants treated with TACE/TAE and 489 participants treated with ES) were included in the present meta-analysis. TAE/TACE group was associated with lower risk of complications (OR = 0.36; 95% CI, 0.22–0.57; P  
ISSN:0174-1551
1432-086X
DOI:10.1007/s00270-020-02514-5