Radiation dose from computed tomography in patients with acute pancreatitis: an audit from a tertiary care referral hospital
Background There is a limited data on the radiation dose from computed tomography (CT) in patients with acute pancreatitis (AP). The present study evaluated the radiation dose from CT scans in patients with AP. Material A retrospective review of CT reports of patients with AP was conducted. The type...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Abdominal imaging 2020-05, Vol.45 (5), p.1517-1523 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
There is a limited data on the radiation dose from computed tomography (CT) in patients with acute pancreatitis (AP). The present study evaluated the radiation dose from CT scans in patients with AP.
Material
A retrospective review of CT reports of patients with AP was conducted. The type of CT scan (non-contrast vs. single-phase vs. biphasic CT) was recorded. The mean number of CT scans and cumulative radiation dose was calculated. The indications and abnormalities on biphasic CT scans were recorded. The radiation doses between different types of the scan were compared.
Results
495 CT studies in 351 patients were evaluated. In patients (
n
= 78, 22.2%) undergoing multiple CT scans, mean number of CT scans per patient and mean radiation dose were 2.64 ± 1.18 (range 2–9) and 24 ± 15 mSv (range 8.3–79.8 mSv), respectively. The mean radiation dose was significantly greater in patients with modified CT severity index ≥ 8 (
n
= 63) [25.08 mSv vs. 18.96 mSv, (
P
= 0.048)]. 61 (12.32%) biphasic scans were performed. A definite indication for a biphasic CT scan was identified in 20 (32.7%) patients. Arterial abnormalities were detected in 6 (9.8%) patients undergoing CT for defined indication. Mean radiation dose in this group was 13.26 ± 7.64 mSv (range 3.42–38.27 mSv) which was significantly greater than the single venous phase scan (7.96 ± 3.48 mSv,
P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2366-004X 2366-0058 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00261-020-02408-7 |