Standardized added metabolic activity (SAM) IN 18F-FDG PET assessment of treatment response in colorectal liver metastases

Purpose Standardized added metabolic activity (SAM) is a PET parameter for assessing the total metabolic load of malignant processes, avoiding partial volume effects and lesion segmentation. The potential role of this parameter in the assessment of response to chemotherapy and bevacizumab was tested...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging 2013-08, Vol.40 (8), p.1214-1222
Hauptverfasser: Mertens, Jeroen, De Bruyne, S., Van Damme, N., Smeets, P., Ceelen, W., Troisi, R., Laurent, S., Geboes, K., Peeters, M., Goethals, I., Van de Wiele, C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Standardized added metabolic activity (SAM) is a PET parameter for assessing the total metabolic load of malignant processes, avoiding partial volume effects and lesion segmentation. The potential role of this parameter in the assessment of response to chemotherapy and bevacizumab was tested in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with potentially resectable liver metastases (mCRC). Methods 18 F-FDG PET/CT was performed in 18 mCRC patients with liver metastases before treatment and after five cycles of FOLFOX/FOLFIRI and bevacizumab. Of the 18 patients, 16 subsequently underwent resection of liver metastases. Baseline and follow-up SUV max , and SAM as well as reduction in SUV max (∆SUV max ) and SAM (∆SAM) of all liver metastases were correlated with morphological response, and progression-free and overall survival (PFS and OS). Results A significant reduction in metabolic activity of the liver metastases was seen after chemotherapy with a median ∆SUV max of 25.3 % and ∆SAM of 94.5 % ( p  = 0.033 and 0.003). Median baseline SUV max and SAM values were significantly different between morphological responders and nonresponders (3.8 vs. 7.2, p  = 0.021; and 34 vs. 211, p  = 0.002, respectively), but neither baseline PET parameters nor morphological response was correlated with PFS or OS. Follow-up SUV max and SAM as well as ∆SAM were found to be prognostic factors. The median PFS and OS in the patient group with a high follow-up SUV max were 10.4 months and 32 months, compared to a median PFS of 14.7 months and a median OS which had not been reached in the group with a low follow-up SUV max ( p  = 0.01 and 0.003, respectively). The patient group with a high follow-up SAM and a low ∆SAM had a median PFS and OS of 9.4 months and 32 months, whereas the other group had a median PFS of 14.7 months and a median OS which had not been reached ( p  = 0.002 for both PFS and OS). Conclusion 18 F-FDG PET imaging is a useful tool to assess treatment response and predict clinical outcome in patients with mCRC who undergo chemotherapy before liver metastasectomy. Follow-up SUV max , follow-up SAM and ∆SAM were found to be significant prognostic factors for PFS and OS.
ISSN:1619-7070
1619-7089
DOI:10.1007/s00259-013-2421-z