Variability of aflatoxin test results

Using 12 lb samples, 280 g subsamples, the Waltking method of analysis, and densitometric procedures, the sampling, subsampling, and analytical variances associated with aflatoxin test procedures were estimated. Regression analysis indicated that each of the above variance components is a function o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society 1974-05, Vol.51 (5), p.214-218
Hauptverfasser: Whitaker, T.B, Dickens, J.W, Monroe, R.J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Using 12 lb samples, 280 g subsamples, the Waltking method of analysis, and densitometric procedures, the sampling, subsampling, and analytical variances associated with aflatoxin test procedures were estimated. Regression analysis indicated that each of the above variance components is a function of the concentration of aflatoxin in the population being tested. Results, for the test procedures given above, showed that sampling constitutes the greatest single source of error, followed by subsampling and analysis. Functional relationships are presented to determine the sampling, subsampling, and analytical variance for any size sample, subsample, and number of analyses.
ISSN:0003-021X
1558-9331
DOI:10.1007/BF02632897