Fasting and postprandial absorption of digoxin from a microencapsulated formulation

The absorption of digoxin from a capsule preparation containing a large number of small, enteric-coated granules of the glycoside (Preparation CR) was compared in 10 volunteers with that from a rapidly dissolving tablet (Preparation L). Plasma and urine digoxin concentrations were measured by radioi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of clinical pharmacology 1983-01, Vol.25 (2), p.207-210
Hauptverfasser: BERGDAHL, B, BOGENTOFT, C, JONSSON, U. E, MAGNUSSON, J. O
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The absorption of digoxin from a capsule preparation containing a large number of small, enteric-coated granules of the glycoside (Preparation CR) was compared in 10 volunteers with that from a rapidly dissolving tablet (Preparation L). Plasma and urine digoxin concentrations were measured by radioimmunoassay. In the fasting state, after a loading dose of digoxin (0.76 mg), peak plasma concentrations were significantly (p less than 0.001) lower after CR (2.0 +/- 0.5 nmol/l, mean +/- SD) than L (4.7 +/- 1.1 nmol/l). Peak concentrations after CR were significantly (p less than 0.001) delayed compared to L (3.3 +/- 0.6 h vs 1.1 +/- 0.4 h). Also, postprandial peak plasma concentrations at steady state, were significantly (p less than 0.01) lower after CR (1.0 +/- 0.3 nmol/l) than L (2.7 +/- 0.5 nmol/l), and the peak concentrations occurred later (3.9 +/- 1.7 h vs 1.4 +/- 0.9 h). The area under the plasma concentration-time curves was smaller (p less than 0.01) for CR (17.7 +/- 5.9 nmol X 1(-1) X h) than for L (22.4 +/- 4.1 nmol X 1(-1) X h), and so was the amount of drug excreted in urine (174 +/- 25 micrograms vs 190 +/- 31 micrograms; p less than 0.005). Thus, the absorption rate of digoxin from the enteric-coated formulation was markedly reduced but at the cost of a variable reduction in the amount absorbed.
ISSN:0031-6970
1432-1041
DOI:10.1007/BF00543792