Reply to comments by W. Schneider concerning the paper by M. Miklavčič and C. Y. Wang "Completely passive natural convection" ZAMM 91(7), 601-606 (2011)

Reply to comments by W. Schneider concerning the paper by M. Miklavčič and C. Y. Wang "Completely passive natural convection" ZAMM 91(7), 601-606 (2011)

Schneider misinterpreted the rhetorical question about the second law, which the authors firmly believe not violated. Their main purpose is to show, under the Boussinesq approximation and the Navier‐Stokes, there exist non‐trivial solutions even for quiescent boundary conditions.

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik 2011-12, Vol.91 (12), p.1004-1004
Hauptverfasser: Miklavčič, M., Wang, C.Y.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Schneider misinterpreted the rhetorical question about the second law, which the authors firmly believe not violated. Their main purpose is to show, under the Boussinesq approximation and the Navier‐Stokes, there exist non‐trivial solutions even for quiescent boundary conditions.
ISSN:0044-2267
1521-4001
DOI:10.1002/zamm.201109116