Present and accounted for: Measuring attendance in out-of-school-time programs

Evidence that youth programs have real benefits has prompted efforts to get young people in the door of out-of-school-time (OST) programs. Once youth are enrolled, attendance plays a key role in the participation equation. Children and youth will not benefit unless they attend programs regularly, an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:New directions for youth development 2005, Vol.2005 (105), p.91-107
Hauptverfasser: Fiester, Leila M., Simpkins, Sandra D., Bouffard, Suzanne M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 107
container_issue 105
container_start_page 91
container_title New directions for youth development
container_volume 2005
creator Fiester, Leila M.
Simpkins, Sandra D.
Bouffard, Suzanne M.
description Evidence that youth programs have real benefits has prompted efforts to get young people in the door of out-of-school-time (OST) programs. Once youth are enrolled, attendance plays a key role in the participation equation. Children and youth will not benefit unless they attend programs regularly, and evidence is emerging that those who attend more frequently and for longer periods of time benefit more than their peers whose attendance is more sporadic. Attendance data are the key to linking program participation with youth outcomes. Program leaders also need attendance data for program planning and to demonstrate to funders, government agencies, and other stakeholders that they are serving their targeted numbers and populations of youth well. OST programs vary widely in the amount and frequency of services they offer, and young people vary in how often they take advantage of these services. Some OST programs require daily attendance, while others operate on a voluntary drop-in basis. As a result, simply checking a box for "present" or "absent" does not provide enough information to link attendance to outcomes. This article describes why programs should measure attendance and discusses the four indicators of attendance--absolute attendance, intensity of attendance, duration of attendance, and breadth of attendance. Appropriate measurement of attendance is the cornerstone of a thoughtful evaluation to demonstrate effectiveness and inform program improvement. Engaging in a process of self-reflection about individual needs and goals can help programs to decide why and how to collect attendance data and to understand how these data will play a role in improving the program and the lives of youth. (Contains 26 notes.)
doi_str_mv 10.1002/yd.109
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>eric_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_yd_109</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ790694</ericid><sourcerecordid>EJ790694</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2549-1b37473eca798d4c4f03e6055228f0b8ced59d8367afbb974f0d05b5db85a1ea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E1LxDAQBuAgih-r_gKRngQP0aRpmsSbrOuqrKv4gXoKaTLV6m67JC3af2-1oidP78D7MAOD0DYlB5SQ-LB1XaoltE45E5gLSZe_Z4alouka2gjhlRAqpEpW0RrlKmGUyXU0vfYQoKwjU7rIWFs1ZQ0uyit_FF2CCY0vyufI1DWUzpQWoqKMqqbGVY6DfamqGa6LOUQLXz17Mw-baCU3swBbPzlA96eju-EZnlyNz4fHE2xjnihMMyYSwcAaoaRLbJITBinhPI5lTjJpwXHlJEuFybNMia53hGfcZZIbCoYN0F6_1_oqBA-5XvhibnyrKdFfD9Gt61J1cLeHiyabg_tjPx_owE4PwBf2tx5dCEXSjgzQfl-_FzNo_7min076W7i3Rajh49ca_6ZTwQTXD9Oxnl7ePt4Ida1v2Sf8QIE5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Present and accounted for: Measuring attendance in out-of-school-time programs</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Fiester, Leila M. ; Simpkins, Sandra D. ; Bouffard, Suzanne M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fiester, Leila M. ; Simpkins, Sandra D. ; Bouffard, Suzanne M.</creatorcontrib><description>Evidence that youth programs have real benefits has prompted efforts to get young people in the door of out-of-school-time (OST) programs. Once youth are enrolled, attendance plays a key role in the participation equation. Children and youth will not benefit unless they attend programs regularly, and evidence is emerging that those who attend more frequently and for longer periods of time benefit more than their peers whose attendance is more sporadic. Attendance data are the key to linking program participation with youth outcomes. Program leaders also need attendance data for program planning and to demonstrate to funders, government agencies, and other stakeholders that they are serving their targeted numbers and populations of youth well. OST programs vary widely in the amount and frequency of services they offer, and young people vary in how often they take advantage of these services. Some OST programs require daily attendance, while others operate on a voluntary drop-in basis. As a result, simply checking a box for "present" or "absent" does not provide enough information to link attendance to outcomes. This article describes why programs should measure attendance and discusses the four indicators of attendance--absolute attendance, intensity of attendance, duration of attendance, and breadth of attendance. Appropriate measurement of attendance is the cornerstone of a thoughtful evaluation to demonstrate effectiveness and inform program improvement. Engaging in a process of self-reflection about individual needs and goals can help programs to decide why and how to collect attendance data and to understand how these data will play a role in improving the program and the lives of youth. (Contains 26 notes.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1533-8916</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5781</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/yd.109</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15943138</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Absenteeism ; Adolescent ; Adolescent Behavior - psychology ; After School Programs ; Attendance Patterns ; Average Daily Attendance ; Child ; Consumer Behavior - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Data Collection ; Educational Indicators ; Evaluation Research ; Humans ; Program Development ; Program Effectiveness ; Program Improvement ; Recreation ; Risk Reduction Behavior ; Safety ; Schools - organization &amp; administration ; Self-Help Groups - utilization ; Social Facilitation ; Social Support ; United States ; Young Adults ; Youth Programs</subject><ispartof>New directions for youth development, 2005, Vol.2005 (105), p.91-107</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2549-1b37473eca798d4c4f03e6055228f0b8ced59d8367afbb974f0d05b5db85a1ea3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2549-1b37473eca798d4c4f03e6055228f0b8ced59d8367afbb974f0d05b5db85a1ea3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fyd.109$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fyd.109$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ790694$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15943138$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fiester, Leila M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpkins, Sandra D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouffard, Suzanne M.</creatorcontrib><title>Present and accounted for: Measuring attendance in out-of-school-time programs</title><title>New directions for youth development</title><addtitle>New Directions for Youth Development</addtitle><description>Evidence that youth programs have real benefits has prompted efforts to get young people in the door of out-of-school-time (OST) programs. Once youth are enrolled, attendance plays a key role in the participation equation. Children and youth will not benefit unless they attend programs regularly, and evidence is emerging that those who attend more frequently and for longer periods of time benefit more than their peers whose attendance is more sporadic. Attendance data are the key to linking program participation with youth outcomes. Program leaders also need attendance data for program planning and to demonstrate to funders, government agencies, and other stakeholders that they are serving their targeted numbers and populations of youth well. OST programs vary widely in the amount and frequency of services they offer, and young people vary in how often they take advantage of these services. Some OST programs require daily attendance, while others operate on a voluntary drop-in basis. As a result, simply checking a box for "present" or "absent" does not provide enough information to link attendance to outcomes. This article describes why programs should measure attendance and discusses the four indicators of attendance--absolute attendance, intensity of attendance, duration of attendance, and breadth of attendance. Appropriate measurement of attendance is the cornerstone of a thoughtful evaluation to demonstrate effectiveness and inform program improvement. Engaging in a process of self-reflection about individual needs and goals can help programs to decide why and how to collect attendance data and to understand how these data will play a role in improving the program and the lives of youth. (Contains 26 notes.)</description><subject>Absenteeism</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adolescent Behavior - psychology</subject><subject>After School Programs</subject><subject>Attendance Patterns</subject><subject>Average Daily Attendance</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Consumer Behavior - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Educational Indicators</subject><subject>Evaluation Research</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Program Development</subject><subject>Program Effectiveness</subject><subject>Program Improvement</subject><subject>Recreation</subject><subject>Risk Reduction Behavior</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Schools - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Self-Help Groups - utilization</subject><subject>Social Facilitation</subject><subject>Social Support</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Young Adults</subject><subject>Youth Programs</subject><issn>1533-8916</issn><issn>1537-5781</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10E1LxDAQBuAgih-r_gKRngQP0aRpmsSbrOuqrKv4gXoKaTLV6m67JC3af2-1oidP78D7MAOD0DYlB5SQ-LB1XaoltE45E5gLSZe_Z4alouka2gjhlRAqpEpW0RrlKmGUyXU0vfYQoKwjU7rIWFs1ZQ0uyit_FF2CCY0vyufI1DWUzpQWoqKMqqbGVY6DfamqGa6LOUQLXz17Mw-baCU3swBbPzlA96eju-EZnlyNz4fHE2xjnihMMyYSwcAaoaRLbJITBinhPI5lTjJpwXHlJEuFybNMia53hGfcZZIbCoYN0F6_1_oqBA-5XvhibnyrKdFfD9Gt61J1cLeHiyabg_tjPx_owE4PwBf2tx5dCEXSjgzQfl-_FzNo_7min076W7i3Rajh49ca_6ZTwQTXD9Oxnl7ePt4Ida1v2Sf8QIE5</recordid><startdate>2005</startdate><enddate>2005</enddate><creator>Fiester, Leila M.</creator><creator>Simpkins, Sandra D.</creator><creator>Bouffard, Suzanne M.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Jossey Bass</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2005</creationdate><title>Present and accounted for: Measuring attendance in out-of-school-time programs</title><author>Fiester, Leila M. ; Simpkins, Sandra D. ; Bouffard, Suzanne M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2549-1b37473eca798d4c4f03e6055228f0b8ced59d8367afbb974f0d05b5db85a1ea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Absenteeism</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adolescent Behavior - psychology</topic><topic>After School Programs</topic><topic>Attendance Patterns</topic><topic>Average Daily Attendance</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Consumer Behavior - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Educational Indicators</topic><topic>Evaluation Research</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Program Development</topic><topic>Program Effectiveness</topic><topic>Program Improvement</topic><topic>Recreation</topic><topic>Risk Reduction Behavior</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Schools - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Self-Help Groups - utilization</topic><topic>Social Facilitation</topic><topic>Social Support</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Young Adults</topic><topic>Youth Programs</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fiester, Leila M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpkins, Sandra D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouffard, Suzanne M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>New directions for youth development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fiester, Leila M.</au><au>Simpkins, Sandra D.</au><au>Bouffard, Suzanne M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ790694</ericid><atitle>Present and accounted for: Measuring attendance in out-of-school-time programs</atitle><jtitle>New directions for youth development</jtitle><addtitle>New Directions for Youth Development</addtitle><date>2005</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>2005</volume><issue>105</issue><spage>91</spage><epage>107</epage><pages>91-107</pages><issn>1533-8916</issn><eissn>1537-5781</eissn><abstract>Evidence that youth programs have real benefits has prompted efforts to get young people in the door of out-of-school-time (OST) programs. Once youth are enrolled, attendance plays a key role in the participation equation. Children and youth will not benefit unless they attend programs regularly, and evidence is emerging that those who attend more frequently and for longer periods of time benefit more than their peers whose attendance is more sporadic. Attendance data are the key to linking program participation with youth outcomes. Program leaders also need attendance data for program planning and to demonstrate to funders, government agencies, and other stakeholders that they are serving their targeted numbers and populations of youth well. OST programs vary widely in the amount and frequency of services they offer, and young people vary in how often they take advantage of these services. Some OST programs require daily attendance, while others operate on a voluntary drop-in basis. As a result, simply checking a box for "present" or "absent" does not provide enough information to link attendance to outcomes. This article describes why programs should measure attendance and discusses the four indicators of attendance--absolute attendance, intensity of attendance, duration of attendance, and breadth of attendance. Appropriate measurement of attendance is the cornerstone of a thoughtful evaluation to demonstrate effectiveness and inform program improvement. Engaging in a process of self-reflection about individual needs and goals can help programs to decide why and how to collect attendance data and to understand how these data will play a role in improving the program and the lives of youth. (Contains 26 notes.)</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>15943138</pmid><doi>10.1002/yd.109</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1533-8916
ispartof New directions for youth development, 2005, Vol.2005 (105), p.91-107
issn 1533-8916
1537-5781
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_yd_109
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EBSCOhost Education Source
subjects Absenteeism
Adolescent
Adolescent Behavior - psychology
After School Programs
Attendance Patterns
Average Daily Attendance
Child
Consumer Behavior - statistics & numerical data
Data Collection
Educational Indicators
Evaluation Research
Humans
Program Development
Program Effectiveness
Program Improvement
Recreation
Risk Reduction Behavior
Safety
Schools - organization & administration
Self-Help Groups - utilization
Social Facilitation
Social Support
United States
Young Adults
Youth Programs
title Present and accounted for: Measuring attendance in out-of-school-time programs
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T20%3A46%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Present%20and%20accounted%20for:%20Measuring%20attendance%20in%20out-of-school-time%20programs&rft.jtitle=New%20directions%20for%20youth%20development&rft.au=Fiester,%20Leila%20M.&rft.date=2005&rft.volume=2005&rft.issue=105&rft.spage=91&rft.epage=107&rft.pages=91-107&rft.issn=1533-8916&rft.eissn=1537-5781&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/yd.109&rft_dat=%3Ceric_cross%3EEJ790694%3C/eric_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/15943138&rft_ericid=EJ790694&rfr_iscdi=true