Present and accounted for: Measuring attendance in out-of-school-time programs
Evidence that youth programs have real benefits has prompted efforts to get young people in the door of out-of-school-time (OST) programs. Once youth are enrolled, attendance plays a key role in the participation equation. Children and youth will not benefit unless they attend programs regularly, an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | New directions for youth development 2005, Vol.2005 (105), p.91-107 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 107 |
---|---|
container_issue | 105 |
container_start_page | 91 |
container_title | New directions for youth development |
container_volume | 2005 |
creator | Fiester, Leila M. Simpkins, Sandra D. Bouffard, Suzanne M. |
description | Evidence that youth programs have real benefits has prompted efforts to get young people in the door of out-of-school-time (OST) programs. Once youth are enrolled, attendance plays a key role in the participation equation. Children and youth will not benefit unless they attend programs regularly, and evidence is emerging that those who attend more frequently and for longer periods of time benefit more than their peers whose attendance is more sporadic. Attendance data are the key to linking program participation with youth outcomes. Program leaders also need attendance data for program planning and to demonstrate to funders, government agencies, and other stakeholders that they are serving their targeted numbers and populations of youth well. OST programs vary widely in the amount and frequency of services they offer, and young people vary in how often they take advantage of these services. Some OST programs require daily attendance, while others operate on a voluntary drop-in basis. As a result, simply checking a box for "present" or "absent" does not provide enough information to link attendance to outcomes. This article describes why programs should measure attendance and discusses the four indicators of attendance--absolute attendance, intensity of attendance, duration of attendance, and breadth of attendance. Appropriate measurement of attendance is the cornerstone of a thoughtful evaluation to demonstrate effectiveness and inform program improvement. Engaging in a process of self-reflection about individual needs and goals can help programs to decide why and how to collect attendance data and to understand how these data will play a role in improving the program and the lives of youth. (Contains 26 notes.) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/yd.109 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>eric_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_yd_109</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ790694</ericid><sourcerecordid>EJ790694</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2549-1b37473eca798d4c4f03e6055228f0b8ced59d8367afbb974f0d05b5db85a1ea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E1LxDAQBuAgih-r_gKRngQP0aRpmsSbrOuqrKv4gXoKaTLV6m67JC3af2-1oidP78D7MAOD0DYlB5SQ-LB1XaoltE45E5gLSZe_Z4alouka2gjhlRAqpEpW0RrlKmGUyXU0vfYQoKwjU7rIWFs1ZQ0uyit_FF2CCY0vyufI1DWUzpQWoqKMqqbGVY6DfamqGa6LOUQLXz17Mw-baCU3swBbPzlA96eju-EZnlyNz4fHE2xjnihMMyYSwcAaoaRLbJITBinhPI5lTjJpwXHlJEuFybNMia53hGfcZZIbCoYN0F6_1_oqBA-5XvhibnyrKdFfD9Gt61J1cLeHiyabg_tjPx_owE4PwBf2tx5dCEXSjgzQfl-_FzNo_7min076W7i3Rajh49ca_6ZTwQTXD9Oxnl7ePt4Ida1v2Sf8QIE5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Present and accounted for: Measuring attendance in out-of-school-time programs</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Fiester, Leila M. ; Simpkins, Sandra D. ; Bouffard, Suzanne M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fiester, Leila M. ; Simpkins, Sandra D. ; Bouffard, Suzanne M.</creatorcontrib><description>Evidence that youth programs have real benefits has prompted efforts to get young people in the door of out-of-school-time (OST) programs. Once youth are enrolled, attendance plays a key role in the participation equation. Children and youth will not benefit unless they attend programs regularly, and evidence is emerging that those who attend more frequently and for longer periods of time benefit more than their peers whose attendance is more sporadic. Attendance data are the key to linking program participation with youth outcomes. Program leaders also need attendance data for program planning and to demonstrate to funders, government agencies, and other stakeholders that they are serving their targeted numbers and populations of youth well. OST programs vary widely in the amount and frequency of services they offer, and young people vary in how often they take advantage of these services. Some OST programs require daily attendance, while others operate on a voluntary drop-in basis. As a result, simply checking a box for "present" or "absent" does not provide enough information to link attendance to outcomes. This article describes why programs should measure attendance and discusses the four indicators of attendance--absolute attendance, intensity of attendance, duration of attendance, and breadth of attendance. Appropriate measurement of attendance is the cornerstone of a thoughtful evaluation to demonstrate effectiveness and inform program improvement. Engaging in a process of self-reflection about individual needs and goals can help programs to decide why and how to collect attendance data and to understand how these data will play a role in improving the program and the lives of youth. (Contains 26 notes.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1533-8916</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5781</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/yd.109</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15943138</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Absenteeism ; Adolescent ; Adolescent Behavior - psychology ; After School Programs ; Attendance Patterns ; Average Daily Attendance ; Child ; Consumer Behavior - statistics & numerical data ; Data Collection ; Educational Indicators ; Evaluation Research ; Humans ; Program Development ; Program Effectiveness ; Program Improvement ; Recreation ; Risk Reduction Behavior ; Safety ; Schools - organization & administration ; Self-Help Groups - utilization ; Social Facilitation ; Social Support ; United States ; Young Adults ; Youth Programs</subject><ispartof>New directions for youth development, 2005, Vol.2005 (105), p.91-107</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2549-1b37473eca798d4c4f03e6055228f0b8ced59d8367afbb974f0d05b5db85a1ea3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2549-1b37473eca798d4c4f03e6055228f0b8ced59d8367afbb974f0d05b5db85a1ea3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fyd.109$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fyd.109$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ790694$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15943138$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fiester, Leila M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpkins, Sandra D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouffard, Suzanne M.</creatorcontrib><title>Present and accounted for: Measuring attendance in out-of-school-time programs</title><title>New directions for youth development</title><addtitle>New Directions for Youth Development</addtitle><description>Evidence that youth programs have real benefits has prompted efforts to get young people in the door of out-of-school-time (OST) programs. Once youth are enrolled, attendance plays a key role in the participation equation. Children and youth will not benefit unless they attend programs regularly, and evidence is emerging that those who attend more frequently and for longer periods of time benefit more than their peers whose attendance is more sporadic. Attendance data are the key to linking program participation with youth outcomes. Program leaders also need attendance data for program planning and to demonstrate to funders, government agencies, and other stakeholders that they are serving their targeted numbers and populations of youth well. OST programs vary widely in the amount and frequency of services they offer, and young people vary in how often they take advantage of these services. Some OST programs require daily attendance, while others operate on a voluntary drop-in basis. As a result, simply checking a box for "present" or "absent" does not provide enough information to link attendance to outcomes. This article describes why programs should measure attendance and discusses the four indicators of attendance--absolute attendance, intensity of attendance, duration of attendance, and breadth of attendance. Appropriate measurement of attendance is the cornerstone of a thoughtful evaluation to demonstrate effectiveness and inform program improvement. Engaging in a process of self-reflection about individual needs and goals can help programs to decide why and how to collect attendance data and to understand how these data will play a role in improving the program and the lives of youth. (Contains 26 notes.)</description><subject>Absenteeism</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adolescent Behavior - psychology</subject><subject>After School Programs</subject><subject>Attendance Patterns</subject><subject>Average Daily Attendance</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Consumer Behavior - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Educational Indicators</subject><subject>Evaluation Research</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Program Development</subject><subject>Program Effectiveness</subject><subject>Program Improvement</subject><subject>Recreation</subject><subject>Risk Reduction Behavior</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Schools - organization & administration</subject><subject>Self-Help Groups - utilization</subject><subject>Social Facilitation</subject><subject>Social Support</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Young Adults</subject><subject>Youth Programs</subject><issn>1533-8916</issn><issn>1537-5781</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10E1LxDAQBuAgih-r_gKRngQP0aRpmsSbrOuqrKv4gXoKaTLV6m67JC3af2-1oidP78D7MAOD0DYlB5SQ-LB1XaoltE45E5gLSZe_Z4alouka2gjhlRAqpEpW0RrlKmGUyXU0vfYQoKwjU7rIWFs1ZQ0uyit_FF2CCY0vyufI1DWUzpQWoqKMqqbGVY6DfamqGa6LOUQLXz17Mw-baCU3swBbPzlA96eju-EZnlyNz4fHE2xjnihMMyYSwcAaoaRLbJITBinhPI5lTjJpwXHlJEuFybNMia53hGfcZZIbCoYN0F6_1_oqBA-5XvhibnyrKdFfD9Gt61J1cLeHiyabg_tjPx_owE4PwBf2tx5dCEXSjgzQfl-_FzNo_7min076W7i3Rajh49ca_6ZTwQTXD9Oxnl7ePt4Ida1v2Sf8QIE5</recordid><startdate>2005</startdate><enddate>2005</enddate><creator>Fiester, Leila M.</creator><creator>Simpkins, Sandra D.</creator><creator>Bouffard, Suzanne M.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Jossey Bass</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2005</creationdate><title>Present and accounted for: Measuring attendance in out-of-school-time programs</title><author>Fiester, Leila M. ; Simpkins, Sandra D. ; Bouffard, Suzanne M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2549-1b37473eca798d4c4f03e6055228f0b8ced59d8367afbb974f0d05b5db85a1ea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Absenteeism</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adolescent Behavior - psychology</topic><topic>After School Programs</topic><topic>Attendance Patterns</topic><topic>Average Daily Attendance</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Consumer Behavior - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Educational Indicators</topic><topic>Evaluation Research</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Program Development</topic><topic>Program Effectiveness</topic><topic>Program Improvement</topic><topic>Recreation</topic><topic>Risk Reduction Behavior</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Schools - organization & administration</topic><topic>Self-Help Groups - utilization</topic><topic>Social Facilitation</topic><topic>Social Support</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Young Adults</topic><topic>Youth Programs</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fiester, Leila M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpkins, Sandra D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouffard, Suzanne M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>New directions for youth development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fiester, Leila M.</au><au>Simpkins, Sandra D.</au><au>Bouffard, Suzanne M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ790694</ericid><atitle>Present and accounted for: Measuring attendance in out-of-school-time programs</atitle><jtitle>New directions for youth development</jtitle><addtitle>New Directions for Youth Development</addtitle><date>2005</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>2005</volume><issue>105</issue><spage>91</spage><epage>107</epage><pages>91-107</pages><issn>1533-8916</issn><eissn>1537-5781</eissn><abstract>Evidence that youth programs have real benefits has prompted efforts to get young people in the door of out-of-school-time (OST) programs. Once youth are enrolled, attendance plays a key role in the participation equation. Children and youth will not benefit unless they attend programs regularly, and evidence is emerging that those who attend more frequently and for longer periods of time benefit more than their peers whose attendance is more sporadic. Attendance data are the key to linking program participation with youth outcomes. Program leaders also need attendance data for program planning and to demonstrate to funders, government agencies, and other stakeholders that they are serving their targeted numbers and populations of youth well. OST programs vary widely in the amount and frequency of services they offer, and young people vary in how often they take advantage of these services. Some OST programs require daily attendance, while others operate on a voluntary drop-in basis. As a result, simply checking a box for "present" or "absent" does not provide enough information to link attendance to outcomes. This article describes why programs should measure attendance and discusses the four indicators of attendance--absolute attendance, intensity of attendance, duration of attendance, and breadth of attendance. Appropriate measurement of attendance is the cornerstone of a thoughtful evaluation to demonstrate effectiveness and inform program improvement. Engaging in a process of self-reflection about individual needs and goals can help programs to decide why and how to collect attendance data and to understand how these data will play a role in improving the program and the lives of youth. (Contains 26 notes.)</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>15943138</pmid><doi>10.1002/yd.109</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1533-8916 |
ispartof | New directions for youth development, 2005, Vol.2005 (105), p.91-107 |
issn | 1533-8916 1537-5781 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_yd_109 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EBSCOhost Education Source |
subjects | Absenteeism Adolescent Adolescent Behavior - psychology After School Programs Attendance Patterns Average Daily Attendance Child Consumer Behavior - statistics & numerical data Data Collection Educational Indicators Evaluation Research Humans Program Development Program Effectiveness Program Improvement Recreation Risk Reduction Behavior Safety Schools - organization & administration Self-Help Groups - utilization Social Facilitation Social Support United States Young Adults Youth Programs |
title | Present and accounted for: Measuring attendance in out-of-school-time programs |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T20%3A46%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Present%20and%20accounted%20for:%20Measuring%20attendance%20in%20out-of-school-time%20programs&rft.jtitle=New%20directions%20for%20youth%20development&rft.au=Fiester,%20Leila%20M.&rft.date=2005&rft.volume=2005&rft.issue=105&rft.spage=91&rft.epage=107&rft.pages=91-107&rft.issn=1533-8916&rft.eissn=1537-5781&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/yd.109&rft_dat=%3Ceric_cross%3EEJ790694%3C/eric_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/15943138&rft_ericid=EJ790694&rfr_iscdi=true |