A privacy‐preserving multifactor authentication system

In recent years, there has been a significant number of works on the development of multifactor authentication (MFA) systems. Traditionally, behavioral biometrics (eg, keystroke dynamics) have been known to have the best usability because they do not require one to know or possess anything—they simp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Security and privacy 2019-09, Vol.2 (5), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Acar, Abbas, Liu, Wenyi, Bayeh, Raheem, Akkaya, Kemal, Uluagac, Arif Selcuk
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In recent years, there has been a significant number of works on the development of multifactor authentication (MFA) systems. Traditionally, behavioral biometrics (eg, keystroke dynamics) have been known to have the best usability because they do not require one to know or possess anything—they simply communicate “how you type” to an authenticator. However, though highly usable, MFA approaches that are based on biometrics are highly intrusive, and users' sensitive information is exposed to untrusted servers. To address this privacy concern, in this paper, we present a privacy‐preserving MFA system for computer users, called PINTA. In PINTA, the second factor is a hybrid behavioral profile user, while the first authentication factor is a password. The hybrid profile of the user includes host‐based and network flow‐based features. Since the features include users' sensitive information, it needs to be protected from untrusted parties. To protect users' sensitive profiles and to handle the varying nature of the user profiles, we adopt two cryptographic methods: Fuzzy hashing and fully homomorphic encryption (FHE). Our results show that PINTA can successfully validate legitimate users and detect impostors. Although the results are promising, the trade‐off for privacy preservation is a slight reduction in performance compared with traditional identity‐based MFA techniques.
ISSN:2475-6725
2475-6725
DOI:10.1002/spy2.88