Atomic Transport at Charged Graphene: Why Hydrogen and Oxygen Are So Different

Atoms on charged graphitic carbon surface are relevant to various electrochemical problems, understanding the adsorption and diffusion of adatoms under charging conditions is essential towards using graphene‐like materials in electrochemistry. Using density functional calculations, we show that elec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:ChemistrySelect (Weinheim) 2017-03, Vol.2 (9), p.2797-2802
Hauptverfasser: Nguyen, Manh‐Thuong, Phong, Pham Nam
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Atoms on charged graphitic carbon surface are relevant to various electrochemical problems, understanding the adsorption and diffusion of adatoms under charging conditions is essential towards using graphene‐like materials in electrochemistry. Using density functional calculations, we show that electron or hole doped graphene can strongly change the mobility of H and O adsorbed atoms. Interestingly, charge doping affects the diffusion of H and O in opposite ways, namely, electron doping increases/reduces, while hole doping reduces/increases the diffusion barrier of H/O respectively. Specifically, on neutral graphene the diffusion barriers of H and O are 1.01 and 0.74 eV, which are, upon a hole doping level of +5.9 × 1013 cm−2, 0.77 and 0.90 eV, and upon an electron doping level of −5.9 × 1013 cm−2, 1.36 and 0.38 eV. Thus, within the harmonic transition state theory, at room temperature, the diffusion rate of O can be decreased or increased by 470 or 1 × 106 times, while that of H can be increased or decreased by 1 × 104 or 7 × 105 times, respectively for the above hole or electron doping density. The difference between H and O atomic transport at charged graphene is interpreted in terms of the difference in geometric and bonding changes upon charge doping. Density functional calculations help showing that charge doping significantly affects the adsorption and diffusion of H and O atoms on graphene. In particular, O binds more strongly to the hole doped graphene while H‐graphene binding is weakest in the non‐doping case. Moreover, diffusion barrier is increased/decreased with electron/hole doping for H, whereas it is opposite for O. These results provide additional insights into physics and chemistry of charged graphene, and are helpful for understanding electrochemistry of graphene‐based electrodes.
ISSN:2365-6549
2365-6549
DOI:10.1002/slct.201700484