Observations of oblate hail using dual polarization radar and implications for hail‐detection schemes

Coincidental radar measurements and in situ ground‐truth observations of large, oblate hail has allowed new insights into the fall mode of oblate hailstones. the effect of the fall mode upon hail‐detection algorithms using multi‐parameter radar is investigated and discussed, as is the vexed problem...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Quarterly journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 1999-04, Vol.125 (555), p.993-1016
Hauptverfasser: Smyth, T. J., Blackman, T. M., Illingworth, A. J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Coincidental radar measurements and in situ ground‐truth observations of large, oblate hail has allowed new insights into the fall mode of oblate hailstones. the effect of the fall mode upon hail‐detection algorithms using multi‐parameter radar is investigated and discussed, as is the vexed problem of extracting realistic rainfall rates in regions where hail and rain coexist. Observations presented here show that oblate hail can be associated with nonzero values of differential reflectivity, Zdr, which, together with the coincidental values of the linear depolarization ratio, suggest some degree of alignment. Although large hail can dominate backscatter through the diameter‐to‐the‐sixth‐power dependence, even if it is aligned it makes a negligible contribution to specific differential phase, Kdp. Rainfall rates extracted using Kdp in the presence of hail are more robust than those using the contaminated reflectivity in the horizontal polarization, Zh, and Zdr measurements, but proposed hail‐detection algorithms which compare the observed values of Kdp and Zh do seem error prone. the hailstones measured in this study were of sufficient dimensions to allow Mie scattering to occur at S‐band (wavelength λ = 9.75 cm). This served to complicate the interpretation of the differential‐phase measurements. A new hail‐detection algorithm has been formulated which compares the differential phase predicted from Zh and Zdr with that actually observed. This avoids the problem of estimating Kdp from the derivative of a noisy differential‐phase profile.
ISSN:0035-9009
1477-870X
DOI:10.1002/qj.49712555512