On Measuring and Modeling Local Average Particle Velocities for particle ensembles in classifying systems
In most multi‐phase flow problems, the particulate phase is exposed to an external field which causes dispersion. Therefore, local velocity measurements of the disperse phase are no longer equivalent with respect to averaging in time and averaging in volume. While the local time‐averaged velocity st...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Particle & particle systems characterization 1995-12, Vol.12 (6), p.299-303 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In most multi‐phase flow problems, the particulate phase is exposed to an external field which causes dispersion. Therefore, local velocity measurements of the disperse phase are no longer equivalent with respect to averaging in time and averaging in volume. While the local time‐averaged velocity still characterizes the transport of the ensemble in the Eulerian sense, one has to be be careful in modeling this velocity average by considering the ensemble's composition. It is shown for different particle ensembles that the conventional particle velocity average M1,0 calculated with respect to the dispersion relationship and a particle size number density distribution is far below the measured ensemble average; the deviation depends on the width of the particle size distribution. It is deduced that Eulerian particle velocity values referring to a certain time interval can be modeled by a ratio of velocity moments M2,0/M1,0 calculated with particle size number distributions referring to a certain probe volume. This relationship was confirmed by measurements. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0934-0866 1521-4117 |
DOI: | 10.1002/ppsc.19950120609 |