A difference of six orders of magnitude: A reply to "the magnitude of the fragmentation rate coefficient"
There has been an ongoing debate regarding the mechanism that causes rate retardation phenomena observed in some reversible addition‐fragmentation transfer (RAFT) polymerization systems. Some attribute the retardation to slow fragmentation of adduct radicals, others attribute it to fast fragmentatio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of polymer science. Part A, Polymer chemistry Polymer chemistry, 2003-09, Vol.41 (18), p.2833-2839 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | There has been an ongoing debate regarding the mechanism that causes rate retardation phenomena observed in some reversible addition‐fragmentation transfer (RAFT) polymerization systems. Some attribute the retardation to slow fragmentation of adduct radicals, others attribute it to fast fragmentation coupled with cross‐termination between propagating and adduct radicals. There exists a difference of six orders of magnitude (10−2 versus 104/s) in the reported values of the fragmentation rate constant (kf0) for virtually similar RAFT systems of PStSC · (Ph)SPSt. In this communication, we explain the estimates of kf ∼ 104/s and the choices of the rate constant in modeling based on experimental polymerization rate and radical concentration data. The use of kf ∼ 10−2/s in the model results in a calculated adduct radical concentration level of 10−4 to 10−3 mol/L, which appears to directly contradict the reported electron spin resonance (ESR) data in the range of |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0887-624X 1099-0518 |
DOI: | 10.1002/pola.10853 |