Endometrial Cancer: Who Lives, Who Dies, Can We Improve Their Story?

Background Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic cancer in the U.S. The objective of this cohort study was to characterize the clinical and pathologic features that are associated with endometrial cancer–specific death for women cared for at a single National Cancer Institute–design...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The oncologist (Dayton, Ohio) Ohio), 2021-12, Vol.26 (12), p.1044-1051
Hauptverfasser: Cosgrove, Casey M., Backes, Floor J., O'Malley, David, Bixel, Kristin L., Suarez, Adrian A., Fowler, Jeffrey M., Copeland, Larry J., Goodfellow, Paul J., Cohn, David E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic cancer in the U.S. The objective of this cohort study was to characterize the clinical and pathologic features that are associated with endometrial cancer–specific death for women cared for at a single National Cancer Institute–designated comprehensive cancer center. Patients, Materials, and Methods This is a retrospective cohort from 2014 to 2017 including all women who had a hysterectomy for EC. Charts were reviewed for clinical and pathologic data, focusing on survival outcomes. Results Seven hundred seventy‐one patients with EC underwent hysterectomy with 760 informative for outcomes. Seventy‐six (10%) deaths were related to their EC; 62 women died from recurrent EC. Nonendometrioid histology and advanced stage were predictors of recurrence and EC death. Among patients with endometrioid ECs, mismatch repair status was significantly associated with EC‐specific survival (relative risk = 4.8; 95% confidence interval, 2.3–10.3; p < .0001). Most patients with EC who recurred died of their disease 62/83 (74.7%). Nearly half of the patients that recurred (27/62) had no additional therapy at the time of recurrence. Overall survival was significantly longer for those women who had additional treatment at the time of recurrence; however, the improvement in overall survival with therapy at recurrence was largely attributable to effects in those women who were adjuvant therapy naïve. Conclusion Although there is benefit of treatment at the time of recurrence for treatment‐naïve women; only approximately half of patients were able to receive therapy. There is an urgent need for continued efforts for more effective EC therapy in both the front‐line and recurrent setting as well as early identification of cancer diagnosis and recurrence. Implications for Practice Approximately 10% of patients died of their endometrial cancer. Most deaths were from recurrent disease; however, almost 20% of endometrial cancer deaths were within 120 days of surgery. Although treatment at the time of recurrence improves overall survival, only approximately half of patients will receive therapy at the time of recurrence. Traditional prognostic features like histology and stage remain important to predict risk of recurrence, and newer biomarkers, such as mismatch repair status, may improve risk stratification and targeted therapy. There remains an urgent need for improved therapy and early detection of diagnosis and recurren
ISSN:1083-7159
1549-490X
DOI:10.1002/onco.13934